What we have now works just fine... that's really all I'm saying. maybe the meaning behind "please excuse my constant desire to improve things" was lost over the internet, but it sounds like you're being a smart-ass.
At any rate I made a deal with the rest of the staff not to try to police the forum so I'm bowing out now.
Posts:803 Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:Website, YouTube
They all show for me (latest version of firefox) though XL3 appears as a tiny thumbnail 100px wide only. All the rest look normal. Already got copies of these saved to my HD.
_________________ "The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
Posts:2804 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Just a quick question, why we have two 100m template types ? I understand that one is for ship that we don't have info about underwater hull. Second is when we have underwater hull. But we really need templates in two sizes ?
It probably looks prettier and more uniform if the lower edge of the entire picture is always the same distance from the lower drawing line (water line or bottom of the hull, depending on the drawing). It looks rather awkward otherwise(just try to copy-paste a drawing from the archive with an UW hull, then delete the latter.)
Posts:2804 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Not really, maybe instead of changing size of whole template we just lower the waterline inside the template. Then we have one template for both solution not two different size templates.