Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 2  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2
Author Message
Charwhick
Post subject: Re: Could you launch aircraft from an submarine?Posted: April 4th, 2014, 6:48 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 104
Joined: March 22nd, 2014, 1:28 am
The least worst way would simply to retrofit Tomahawks or other SLCMs as mini-UAVs. Might be neat for surface search without telling the world where you are.

_________________
Worklist:
FFG Halifax Redraw


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Could you launch aircraft from an submarine?Posted: April 4th, 2014, 8:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
or just use an Norwegian Skjold class stealth ship. all they are going to se is an small fishing boat on the radar...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Could you launch aircraft from an submarine?Posted: April 4th, 2014, 10:06 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Supposedly they're trying to launch ScanEagles out of torpedo tubes.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
RP1
Post subject: Re: Could you launch aircraft from an submarine?Posted: April 6th, 2014, 11:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 208
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:48 pm
Location: Engerlands
Contact: Website
As has been noted the problem is not really launching the aircraft but recovering them. One possibility is to use a tail-sitter VTOL and if you do a Google image search for "Boeing an-1" you will find several images of designs for a such a system.

Of note is that these designs - and the operational aircraft carrying submarines - do not have a single pressure hull containing the hangar. Either an arrangement similar to the SSGN USS Halibut is used, where the hangar is composed of angled pressure hulls with the aircraft withdrawn through hatches at the rear end, or alternatively the aircraft are housed in fat vertical tubes, like the missiles on an SSBN. You could of course arrange these with multiple pressure hulls side-by-side.

The hull shape of such a submarine would be different from normal, as you would want to improve the stability on the surface - unless stabilisers were fitted (IIRC the Russian Typhoon class actually has bilge keels to improve surfaced motions). This, plus the larger external casing to wrap around all the pressure hulls, would increase the powering requirements.

This, plus all the extra structure - and not just more tubes, mind you, but complicated forged inserts and transitions and external stiffening to stop the hulls breaking off under shock - would increase the cost "somewhat". Which raises the question of "why?". On the plus side all the extra steel would help to offset one minor problem - aircraft carriers mostly carry air and are thus not very dense. Submarines rather need to have a relative density to the water of about 1. :D

RP1

_________________
"Yes siree, the excitement never stops." Togusa, Ghost in the Shell


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 2  [ 14 posts ]  Return to “General Discussion” | Go to page « 1 2

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]