Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
rifleman
Post subject: type 26 frigatePosted: June 30th, 2014, 1:30 pm
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
http://ukdefencejournal.wordpress.com/2 ... mpression/

interesting article

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: type 26 frigatePosted: June 30th, 2014, 3:24 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
https://www.facebook.com/type26frigate?fref=nf


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: type 26 frigatePosted: June 30th, 2014, 4:42 pm
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
cheers

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
iiradned
Post subject: Re: type 26 frigatePosted: July 2nd, 2014, 8:33 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 141
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 11:36 am
rifleman wrote:
All I get is a page stating that the authors have deleted the blog.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: type 26 frigatePosted: August 1st, 2014, 9:28 am
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
looks like type 26 won't have harpoon

http://www.janes.com/article/41351/uk-c ... eyond-2018

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: type 26 frigatePosted: August 1st, 2014, 9:38 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Unsurprising. Though not without reasoning. In all honesty I don't foresee the need for a heavyweight SSM for the sorts of actions we're likely to undertake before a replacement (Perseus or w/e) is available.
Something shorter ranged and more numerous might well be a better investment IMO.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
RP1
Post subject: Re: type 26 frigatePosted: August 1st, 2014, 9:50 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 208
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:48 pm
Location: Engerlands
Contact: Website
Harpoon has always been a bit dubious for use outside of Total War scenarios. One rather suspects that the assumption is that USN developments along the lines of the LRASM (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Range ... ip_Missile) will be used. I'm not sure T26 even has space for a conventional SSM launcher.

RP1

_________________
"Yes siree, the excitement never stops." Togusa, Ghost in the Shell


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: type 26 frigatePosted: August 1st, 2014, 4:03 pm
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
it can go in Mk 41vls
could Scalpe be used in ASM role

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
apdsmith
Post subject: Re: type 26 frigatePosted: August 1st, 2014, 4:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Hi rifleman - I thought that nobody had developed the VLS version of harpoon - the canisters are lower impact, from what I read when MihoshiK and Colombamike were discussing it, so nobody's bothered to get VLS working...

Ad

_________________
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
[ img ]
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
RP1
Post subject: Re: type 26 frigatePosted: August 1st, 2014, 5:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 208
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:48 pm
Location: Engerlands
Contact: Website
I think rifleman was referring to the LRASM, which will be VLS launched. My point RE T26 was that cannister launched options such as Exocet or NSM would be unlikely. A purchase specifically for T23 and T45 might not be impossible, however.

On a historical note, Harpoon - or at least Harpoon test shapes - were successfully test fired from MK41s on land. My understanding is that it worked just fine, but with the post-CW move away from a Total War scenario the dim-but-enthusiastic Harpoon and its associated missilespam approach was no longer desirable. I think I have read that some of the later Burkes don't even have provision for the missiles to be retro-fitted anymore.

RP1

_________________
"Yes siree, the excitement never stops." Togusa, Ghost in the Shell


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 17 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]