I adjoin the sentiments here, drawing of the month would be great idea to re-introduce, but also at the same time, the voting should be made easy and simple as possible. I would start with the simple forum poll system first.
Just thought about one thing. Would the participating entries be counted by each drawing separately, or by entries (like whole posts showing whole class)? Look at recent Olekit24's posts in Merchant Ships thread - if the 1st option were to be used, I can theoretically imagine a situation, where there are more votes total on such "series", but because the votes spread between each individual drawing, the winner would be someone elses' work, which contained just one drawing that happened to get more votes than any of the individual ones from the "series", but far less that "series'" grand total.
Krakatoa wrote: * | February 27th, 2021, 1:25 am |
RL/NW drawings do take much more time to complete than AU or PD drawings. For that reason those people who have only limited time to produce pixel art are happy to do something which produces visible results in a short period of time.
Good point about people wanting to "get results, quick", though at the same time I'm not sure if drawing a fanciful aircraft carrier is really faster than drawing a real gunboat or a fishing cutter.
Krakatoa wrote: * | February 27th, 2021, 1:25 am |
The splitting of Shipbucket into those who are in Discord and those who are not has split Shipbucket into sections, to the detriment of both.
I share that feeling.
Anyway, the Discord server has now greatly overtaken the forum in activity and I would encourage anyone not using it to join us as the speed of discussion is much faster than the board and it's nice to see WIPs and help other users with their research in real time. Of course people are welcome to stay away (I agree Discord can have its childish moments and we try to cut down on this) and remain on the board entirely. It's your choice... you can't really lose either way.
Besides the "atmosphere" factor, fact that Discord is, as I understand, essentialy a chat, means that it's pointless for me to attempt to use it. Nowadays I have both time and mood to log in and comment etc. like once-twice per week on average (I do peek into a forum without logging-in at least once every day, and even several times, but these are just like one-minute views on what's going on, without looking closely at details of drawings, reading backstories or details of discussions), and I wouldn't be on Discord any more often, so pretty much all activity there would pass past me anyway.
Good, convenient, side of message-board-like communication for me is precisely the fact, that it is NOT "much faster" - I can answer now, or in one hour, or later that day etc.
Hi. Good points raised here. Of redrawing of the ships, its kind to ask beforehand for do so, perhaps its one of those netiquette things, though the answer in all cases should be, yes you can redraw what ever thing you want, even without such permission.
With the passing time, asking for that permission is often getting bigger and bigger problem, because more and more Veteran artist simply aren't here any more to answer.
Only thing that needs consideration from our behalf is the uploading it to the archive, where we just basicly need to consider if the new drawing is objectively better.
I've always envisioned SB archive to be place were myriad of drawings of same ship by different artists from different time could exist, rather than some uniform machine where single "official" picture presents that one thing. In such archive I envisioned, the doormat to redraw stuff would be lower, as well would be any hurt pride or resentment from the original artists.
In regards to SB-scale, Archive allows to mark the drawing as "outdated" (which is visible when one enters it), so the old drawings are kept (with that marking) even when new ones appear. And since in reality a huge chunk of these new works are depictions of "ship X in various times", while old ("to be replaced") so often show "ship X at some random, unspecified time"), then for me (as uploader) it's sufficient (in combination with visible stylistical improvements) to consider it a "valid and valuable progress", without getting into deeper considerations of what "objectively better" means.
That said, FD-scale Archive has no "mark as outdated" option, and, when eligible, old pictures are replaced entirely by new ones (with some caveats - I can elaborate on it, if necessary, but that's not the main issue right now).