...it's really the guy literally sleeping on the job on Californian's radio room that's perhaps most culpable for lost life.
I, and any other reasonable man, should refuse to blame poor Cyril Evans,
Californian's radioman. He attempted to warn
Titanic's radioman Jack Phillips no less than twice, but was told by Phillips in plain language via Morse code
"Shut up, shut up! I am busy; I am working Cape Race!" This meant that Phillips gave the man a figurative slap in the face, by literally telling him that the Astor's instructions to their dog-sitters were more important than his ice warning. Under these circumstances, one can hardly say that Mr. Evans generates any culpability for simply going to bed after a hard day's work... especially when Harold Bride,
Titanic's radioman on the previous shift, had received and acknowledged his ice warning.
Third Officer C.V. Groves also attempted to contact
Titanic whom they believed that they spotted at a range of roughly 10 miles, via signal lamp as a secondary means of attempting to pass on the ice warning. The ship they spotted, a 'large and well-lit liner' in the direction of
Titanic, did not respond. Unbeknownst to the crew of the
California's crew,
Titanic could not have possibly spotted the signal lamp... David Blair, released from his position as Titanic's Second officer, left the ship with the key to the locker containing the ship's binoculars. At ten miles, a single signal lamp would have been difficult, if not impossible, to read without binoculars. I have never been able to understand why someone with such a sterling reputation as Captain Smith simply did not break open the locker, knowing that his years of experience and station in the company would protect him from the worst of the repercussions of that action.
Titanic's fate cannot be placed at the feet of any one man, there are simply too many strange happenings and outstanding misfortunes. Trying to say 'this man caused the horrible loss of life' is similar to attempting to pin down exactly who is responsible for 'causing' the World Trade Center to collapse through 'poor design' and 'insufficient preparation'- because, after all, the Empire State Building had been hit by aircraft before and survived. So, we knew it was possible for a building to be hit by a airplane and survive... why didn't their building preform equally well?
Rather a silly thought, now isn't it, once it's put in prospective?