Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 13  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 513 »
Author Message
Rhade
Post subject: Re: HNoMS Helge Ingstad have collidedPosted: November 8th, 2018, 11:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
heuhen wrote: *
We are here in Norway start asking, how solid is the ship build. It's supposed to withstand a lot
Near half of the ship side was cut open, 2/5 or 3/5 of compartments open to water and flooded. Engine room probably too. I doubt that any other ship would survive such collision and stay afloat.

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: HNoMS Helge Ingstad have collidedPosted: November 8th, 2018, 12:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_8EIcjUsyc
Resting on its side now apparently.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: HNoMS Helge Ingstad have collidedPosted: November 8th, 2018, 12:44 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
There is other vid on that channel... that tug at the end, he is pushing frigate towards land or trying to pull it back?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGHPkw6F5cA

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: HNoMS Helge Ingstad have collidedPosted: November 8th, 2018, 1:12 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Rhade wrote: *
There is other vid on that channel... that tug at the end, he is pushing frigate towards land or trying to pull it back?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGHPkw6F5cA
In that video: the tug is holding the frigate in to land, to prevent it from moving, while waiting for more tugs. Later they pushed here more inn, where she is laying at a +-45° angle.


The latest update is that they are drilling bolts in to the ground, to lock the frigate in place, before they can start the work


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: HNoMS Helge Ingstad have collidedPosted: November 8th, 2018, 1:40 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Close up, solid hit.
[ img ]

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: HNoMS Helge Ingstad have collidedPosted: November 8th, 2018, 3:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Rhade wrote: *
Close up, solid hit.
[ img ]
There is also damage under water on here. The Hangar damage comes from the tank boat anchor, have I read.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: HNoMS Helge Ingstad have collidedPosted: November 8th, 2018, 3:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
As the Navy says, a frigate is a light ship, build to be light, it's not an heavily armored ship like they did in the old days. if the ship should be heavily armored, it would be big and heavy. With today weapon technology there is no point building a ship heavy armored, it's wouldn't help.


[ img ]

[ img ]

[ img ]

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: HNoMS Helge Ingstad have collidedPosted: November 8th, 2018, 3:58 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Hood wrote: *
Looks very serious.

I know in all recent cases of ramming, naval vessels have hit fully laden cargo vessels, but I wonder how strongly built and survivable modern naval vessels really are? Has the drive to reduce weight and cost gone too far?
Ramming went out of favor as a naval tactic because it is short range, not because it is ineffective. Steel is what it is, and you will not reject millions of kg-m/s by any realistic mechanism. Let us not forget that tough, beefy ships will injure themselves under their own weight if drydocked carelessly.

I close with a picture,
[ img ]
If you think that looks bad, you should see the other guy, the destroyer HMS Punjabi (both halves of her).

My best wishes, futile as those are, are with the teams working to save the frigate.


Last edited by erik_t on November 8th, 2018, 8:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: HNoMS Helge Ingstad have collidedPosted: November 8th, 2018, 4:09 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
The part of the gash seen in Rhade's pictures is around 35 meters long (guessed using Heuhen's drawings of the class). Realistically, since the damage seem to extend aft on parts of the ship already below water, I'd say it could be in order of 50 meters. The ship, overall, is 134m long.

Lokking at Heuhen's pictures instead, in one the sonar bulb at the bow can be seen out of the water, in others, the bow is further submerged back to the waterline. It seems she is still settling down.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: HNoMS Helge Ingstad have collidedPosted: November 8th, 2018, 4:11 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
The bow submergence/exposure could just be a factor of the tides. I'd be hesitant to make much judgement without a more careful study of that, and without more carefully checking on the exact timing of the photos.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 13  [ 127 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 513 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]