Shipbucket

@APDAF
Your drawing doesn't even really match the (up-scaled) SB-scale one.
Try this:

(I guess that I should enlarge the diameter of propellers even more, though)
note, that "superstructure" has a tear-drop shape - that's why the line at its base is partially black, partially grey.

@Heuhen
Try to think of this one:
http://flyingmachines.ru/Site2/Crafts/Craft31371.htm

That was quick!

Thank you.
I know it does not scale up I should really not draw things at 2am.

P.S: Do I credit you for this?

No problem.
And no need to credit. Have a good fun with that.

UPDATED:

Used eswube's edit and coloured the drawing.

Is there anything wrong with it?

Well, for the beginning, the fuselage wouldn't be covered in metal, but with wood and canvas (and even if it were covered in metal, it would be in a different manner). Secondly, the wings wouldn't have the same thickness from the leading to trailing edge. Thirdly, both ends of fuselage, as well as both ends of "superstructure" are rounded (like vertical cyllinders) so should be shaded accordingly. Tires wouldn't be brown, but more grey-black. And You could work more on these bombs.

Those aren't rivets and panel gaps, there stitches and seams.
I'll fix it later.

That should do it I think.

If you can see the seams in cloth at this distance then it's either done with rope or coming apart

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

Another whiff of an outdated fighter off-loaded to Manchukou:

_________________
Worklist

"If people never did silly things nothing intelligent would ever get done." ~Ludwig Wittgenstein