Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
Gollevainen wrote:
It's Su-37, not S-37 indeed
su-37? that was the development of the SU-27 with canards and vectorial thrust?? or have they named an production model that way as well?
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:4714 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact:Website
no, they just recycled project names. this orginal Su-37 dates from Soviet days. In the russian reign, Suhoj took the designation to use on Su-27 derivates for marketing.
Posts:173 Joined: July 29th, 2010, 1:52 am
Location: Adelaide, S.A Australia
Contact:Yahoo Messenger
Gollevainen wrote:
no, they just recycled project names. this orginal Su-37 dates from Soviet days. In the russian reign, Suhoj took the designation to use on Su-27 derivates for marketing.
Thanks for clearing that up Golly.
_________________
"The British Air Farce have droopped their bums on the water works..They have scored a direct hot on the pimps"- British agent/gendarme Officer Crabtree, "Allo,Allo."
Posts:3220 Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Great drawings chaps Re the P1154 Hood, I wonder if a radar equiped version would have emerged, also the same with a shipborne type? It would make an interesting variant