» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 17 of 25  [ 246 posts ]  Go to page « 1 … 15 16 17 18 19 … 25 »
[Print view]
Author Message
Caddaric79
Post subject: Re: US ARMY OrganizationPosted: February 26th, 2018, 12:56 pm
Offline
Posts: 965
Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am
Thank you!

As i said to Calis, if somebody Would see some Army's "newer" formations, just ask.

Regards

_________________
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rundrewrun99
Post subject: Re: US ARMY OrganizationPosted: February 28th, 2018, 3:57 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 163
Joined: January 1st, 2017, 10:48 pm
I personally would love to see some of the modern formations. Especially some of the specialized units like CSAR and SAR

_________________
Alternate Universe Projects:
Nation of Nukkumaa (A Septentrion Nation)
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8129
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Caddaric79
Post subject: Re: US ARMY OrganizationPosted: February 28th, 2018, 9:28 am
Offline
Posts: 965
Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am
Rather the Air Force then. I will search what I can find in public documents about Rescue Squadrons.
For Special Operations Command, sources looks pretty scarce.

_________________
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
madmike
Post subject: Re: US ARMY OrganizationPosted: February 28th, 2018, 11:50 am
Offline
Posts: 156
Joined: August 2nd, 2010, 4:02 pm
Some mechanized infantry of WWII?
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
AF92
Post subject: Re: US ARMY OrganizationPosted: February 28th, 2018, 1:11 pm
Offline
Posts: 63
Joined: April 11th, 2013, 3:10 pm
Well, I would love to see evolution of U.S. Armored Battalion just like you did with your Russian organizations likewise with M-41, M-46, M-47, M-48, M-60A1/A2, M-103 MBT's. M-551 etc.
From 1950s to present

Or evoultion of mobile artillery, self propelled guns.

Kind regards, I really admire your work and attention to detail.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
signal
Post subject: Re: US ARMY OrganizationPosted: March 1st, 2018, 2:18 am
Offline
Posts: 283
Joined: August 6th, 2010, 5:44 pm
One thing I have noticed in your organizational chart for a
U.S. tank battalion - the symbol you use for the light tank
company is actually the NATO symbol/icon for armored
cavalry. I think you need something else to represent the
light tank (M5 Stuart) company.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
reytuerto
Post subject: Re: US ARMY OrganizationPosted: March 1st, 2018, 2:29 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1647
Joined: February 21st, 2015, 12:03 am
Excellent! Superb work, Caddaric!
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rundrewrun99
Post subject: Re: US ARMY OrganizationPosted: March 1st, 2018, 5:54 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 163
Joined: January 1st, 2017, 10:48 pm
signal wrote: *March 1st, 2018, 2:18 am
One thing I have noticed in your organizational chart for a
U.S. tank battalion - the symbol you use for the light tank
company is actually the NATO symbol/icon for armored
cavalry. I think you need something else to represent the
light tank (M5 Stuart) company.
Would Armored Cavalry not be the best descriptor for a light tank company?

_________________
Alternate Universe Projects:
Nation of Nukkumaa (A Septentrion Nation)
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8129
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Caddaric79
Post subject: Re: US ARMY OrganizationPosted: March 1st, 2018, 10:11 am
Offline
Posts: 965
Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am
Thank you guys !

NATO what? Its a War Department conventional symbol from 1942...

Historicaly the division symbol was re-used for Brigades, Squadrons and Companies with a unit number at the left (4 or D). In some manuals, a little abbreviation (Rcn, LT, HQ, Serv.)

Actually I use this one to indicate clearly the activitiy. In this case:
"reconnaissance and security missions, screen the advance of other tank units, etc."

But to avoid controversy, I can go back to the good old way.

_________________
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cplnew83
Post subject: Re: US ARMY OrganizationPosted: March 1st, 2018, 3:13 pm
Offline
Posts: 419
Joined: January 9th, 2012, 9:50 am
Caddaric79 wrote: *March 1st, 2018, 10:11 am
Thank you guys !

NATO what? Its a War Department conventional symbol from 1942...

Historicaly the division symbol was re-used for Brigades, Squadrons and Companies with a unit number at the left (4 or D). In some manuals, a little abbreviation (Rcn, LT, HQ, Serv.)

Actually I use this one to indicate clearly the activitiy. In this case:
"reconnaissance and security missions, screen the advance of other tank units, etc."

But to avoid controversy, I can go back to the good old way.
Frankly, you shouldn't care of the previous remarks (too much "à coté de le plaque"). Your drawing are just superb and there is nothing to add nor remove nor change.

_________________
Je pardonne à tous ceux qui m'ont offensé... mais je garde la liste!


Worklist, FD scale submarines and ships :
- Project 971 "Akula" (80%)
- Project 705 "Alpha" (10%)
- Project 371 (70%)
- Project 1459 (30%)
- Projekt 151 Sassnitz (To be redone)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 17 of 25  [ 246 posts ]  Return to “FD Scale Drawings” | Go to page « 1 … 15 16 17 18 19 … 25 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]