Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 11 of 52  [ 518 posts ]  Go to page « 19 10 11 12 1352 »
Author Message
Wikipedia & Universe
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: July 19th, 2011, 4:31 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 309
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:19 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact: Website
acelanceloet wrote:
SPY-3 is made to direct ESSM and the SM series, IIRC.
Sweet. Now I no longer need a Mk95 on my CVN and LHDN.

_________________
Fasismi? Ei! Natsismin? Ei! Kommunismi? Ei! Elostelu!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
gkm
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: July 20th, 2011, 3:20 am
Offline
Posts: 16
Joined: October 11th, 2010, 1:00 am
Location: St Paul, MN
theoretically an SM-2 Block III may be able to fit in a Mk-13 launcher - within a few inches to spare.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
paul_541
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: July 20th, 2011, 6:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 395
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:58 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
I enlarged the front views of Harpoon's launchers. Isn't more good according the others views in the drawing !? :?
[ img ]

Thanks for comments. ;)

_________________
My motto:Per ardua ad astra (RCAF)
Current Drawings:
USS Midway CVB-41 and later alterations
HMCS Bonaventure CVL-22 and later alterations
Paul 2024


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: July 20th, 2011, 7:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
gkm wrote:
theoretically an SM-2 Block III may be able to fit in a Mk-13 launcher - within a few inches to spare.
Yes it can, but I haven't bashed one together, and as far as I know, the USN never deployed the SM-2MR in the manner. If someone wants to they could try and bash one together and it might make it to the sheet, I'd have to see what it looks like.
paul_541 wrote:
I enlarged the front views of Harpoon's launchers. Isn't more good according the others views in the drawing !? :?
[ img ]

Thanks for comments. ;)
I'm not sure the change is in order. If you have some scale drawings of the Mk-141 then I'd consider it, but right now I'm going to stick with the recent version that has been drawn.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
squizzy
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: July 23rd, 2011, 1:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 173
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 1:52 am
Location: Adelaide, S.A Australia
Contact: Yahoo Messenger
paul_541 wrote:
I enlarged the front views of Harpoon's launchers. Isn't more good according the others views in the drawing !? :?
[ img ]

Thanks for comments. ;)
Paul I glad you saw the same too! When I first saw the new re-modelled Mk-141 launch canisters i too sought that the canisters on the launch frame looked a pixel or 2 out also and did a similar change to my sheet after i downloaded the latest updated USN parts sheet but sought that i was alone on the spotting.

_________________
[ img ]

"The British Air Farce have droopped their bums on the water works..They have scored a direct hot on the pimps"- British agent/gendarme Officer Crabtree, "Allo,Allo."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: July 23rd, 2011, 11:46 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
When are you ever going to fix the Mk.37 GFCS? The ones on the sheet are the ancient ones I drew for the original iteration of the Fletcher DDs. There is a really nice updated version on the Alaskas.... and have been for some time now. :P

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: July 23rd, 2011, 11:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Colosseum wrote:
When are you ever going to fix the Mk.37 GFCS? The ones on the sheet are the ancient ones I drew for the original iteration of the Fletcher DDs. There is a really nice updated version on the Alaskas.... and have been for some time now. :P
I didn't know it was in need of updating, but I'll mark it down. I've got midterms this next week so it may be next weekend before I push the update, or it maybe later tonight - it just depends on how bored I get.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: July 24th, 2011, 1:07 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
That's largely my fault. The grand unified US parts sheet predates the new Alaska by quite a while, and sometimes I just failed to correctly push an updated part.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cybermax
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: August 25th, 2011, 4:41 am
Offline
Posts: 331
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:41 pm
155mm AGS Lite

http://events.us.baesystems.com/SAS/pro ... -Lite.html


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colombamike
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: August 25th, 2011, 7:05 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille
Cybermax wrote:
HOW !!! :o
Extremely interesting & very usefull for a possible Arleigh Burke Flight III
(more smaller/compact, more "light-weight" mount)
:D


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 11 of 52  [ 518 posts ]  Return to “Official Parts Sheets” | Go to page « 19 10 11 12 1352 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]