Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
US Next Generation Frigate http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1551 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Author: | Cipher53 [ July 19th, 2011, 5:14 am ] |
Post subject: | US Next Generation Frigate |
First post on the forums, and not posted in the beginner's section because I don't intend to draw it shipbucket style. I'm working on an upgrade package for the OHP for a project for another site, and used a shipbucket design for a starting point because it looked rather good in comparison to some other stuff that I've seen out there. For the most part its the same weaponry, but now I'm going back to rework the drawing and I've got mediocre feedback from one place that I went to for advice, so I was hoping to get some feedback here. My current plans ATM are;
Does anybody here have any input? (Non-consistent of complaining about the styling. I'm already well aware after lurking here how some of you feel about SB/GB/Whatever Bucket you want to talk about styling) |
Author: | ALVAMA [ July 19th, 2011, 7:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade Project |
wtf, why is that watermark credit there? |
Author: | Gollevainen [ July 19th, 2011, 8:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade Project |
Yes the copyrigth of all shipbucket drawings, be their as altered as possible still remains to the orginal artists and for the shipbucket community |
Author: | Thiel [ July 19th, 2011, 11:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade Project |
Why upgrade the Perry to carry Burke level armament? The entire point of the Perry is to be cheap and numerous. This was achieved by shrink wrapping it around the minimum necessary systems required for its mission. Start fitting it with AEGIS etc and price will go up drastically, which means it won't be numerous and therefore it will have failed its primary mission. And I agree with Alvama. Why the watermark? |
Author: | ReiAyanami [ July 19th, 2011, 11:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade Project |
Also, I think they have a lot of aluminium, especially in the superstructure, which won't allow any more weight added on top without seriously rebuilding the ship. Unless of course it is a fantasy design, in whixh case it is great. |
Author: | Karle94 [ July 19th, 2011, 11:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade Project |
The OHP was built to be in numbers in order to escort convoys. This task was for the newer WWII destroyers such as the Fletcher, Sumner and Gearing classes well into the 60`s-70`s. When the OHP began to appear in numbers they took over this role. If you want a refit of the OHP, try something a little less extensive, costly and more practical and more relevant to escort duty. This looks a lot like the Spanish frigate Alvaro De Bazan. |
Author: | TimothyC [ July 19th, 2011, 12:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade Project |
That's not an upgrade, that's an all new ship. |
Author: | Rodondo [ July 19th, 2011, 12:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade Project |
This^, the forward superstructure is nothing similar to what I remember from my visit to the HMAS Melbourne (an Aussie OHP) |
Author: | acelanceloet [ July 19th, 2011, 2:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade Project |
apart from the watermark and the wrong or old parts, I cannot think of any reason why this is in non-sb section..... |
Author: | Thiel [ July 19th, 2011, 2:45 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade Project | |
That's not an upgrade, that's an all new ship.
This as well. As I said, the Perry class is essentially shrink-wrapped around its systems, making it almost impossible to rearrange its innards.
|
Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |