Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
hoome6915
Post subject: IKN Gwang-Mu class BBPosted: September 24th, 2014, 4:30 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 12
Joined: September 5th, 2014, 6:29 pm
[ img ]

It is a my first Battleship shipbucket.
In 19C, Korea was called Chosen, and King Go-Jong had changed the country name to "Imperial of Korea"
But Imperial of Korea was colonialized by Imperial of Japan.

This ship was plannd by me.
"if the Imperial of Korea was alive and go advanced with other country, this battleship was build by "Imperial of Korea."

Ship data
load displacement : 49,260 ton
whole length : 243m
whole width : 36m
horsepower : 115,000HP
maximum speed : 28 knot
cruising speed : 25 knot
weapon : 16 Inch main gun X 10 (two twin gun and two triple gun)
13.3cm secondary gun X 16
40mm anti-air gun X 40
12.7mm machine gun X 10
2 hydroplane
armor : side 340mm
deck 190mm
turret 406mm
bridge 406mm
price : $59,238,000


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Dilandu
Post subject: Re: IKN Gwang-Mu class BBPosted: September 24th, 2014, 4:49 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 381
Joined: October 8th, 2011, 11:26 am
Location: Russian Federation
Hm. IMHO, the rear turrets are too far to rear. The ship would have a roll on the stern.

The catapult is pretty weird placed . Especially when you have a wide space between the superstructure.

And light AA guns on bow and stermn would be destroyed during any chase or retirade fire.

_________________
Serve the Nation! Be striped!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
hoome6915
Post subject: Re: IKN Gwang-Mu class BBPosted: September 24th, 2014, 5:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 12
Joined: September 5th, 2014, 6:29 pm
Dilandu wrote:
Hm. IMHO, the rear turrets are too far to rear. The ship would have a roll on the stern.

The catapult is pretty weird placed . Especially when you have a wide space between the superstructure.

And light AA guns on bow and stermn would be destroyed during any chase or retirade fire.
thanks you about your advice. I will get better next time.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
JSB
Post subject: Re: IKN Gwang-Mu class BBPosted: September 24th, 2014, 5:30 pm
Offline
Posts: 1433
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 5:33 pm
When was it built ? (looks late 30s to me)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
hoome6915
Post subject: Re: IKN Gwang-Mu class BBPosted: September 24th, 2014, 5:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 12
Joined: September 5th, 2014, 6:29 pm
JSB wrote:
When was it built ? (looks late 30s to me)
May 1940.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: IKN Gwang-Mu class BBPosted: September 24th, 2014, 6:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
hoome6915 wrote:
In 19C, Korea was called Chosen, and King Go-Jong had changed the country name to "Imperial of Korea"
But Imperial of Korea was colonialized by Imperial of Japan.
More correct would be Empire of Korea and Empire of Japan. ;)

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eltf177
Post subject: Re: IKN Gwang-Mu class BBPosted: September 24th, 2014, 7:33 pm
Offline
Posts: 503
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 5:03 pm
Your data sheet says she carries sixteen 133mm guns but I only see twelve...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: IKN Gwang-Mu class BBPosted: September 24th, 2014, 7:48 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
eltf177 wrote:
Your data sheet says she carries sixteen 133mm guns but I only see twelve...
Four twins per side if I'm not mistaken. 4x2x2=16

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: IKN Gwang-Mu class BBPosted: September 25th, 2014, 4:36 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
Dilandu wrote:
Hm. IMHO, the rear turrets are too far to rear. The ship would have a roll on the stern.

The catapult is pretty weird placed . Especially when you have a wide space between the superstructure.

And light AA guns on bow and stermn would be destroyed during any chase or retirade fire.
Most battleships of that era had some form of AA on the bow and stern, my one point is not having them that close to one another, they seem to be a crowded

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
apdsmith
Post subject: Re: IKN Gwang-Mu class BBPosted: September 25th, 2014, 9:04 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Hi hoome,

Looks like a nice ship, but in addition to the other comments I have a couple, if that's OK?

Firstly, can you confirm how many shafts this ship has? It looks like a three-shaft layout, however, the only navy that really went for that was the Kriegsmarine and they suffered for it - both the Lutzow and the Prinz Eugen suffered severe damage aft that certainly wasn't helped by the design compromises forced by a three-shaft layout.

The spotting top looks quite large - anything up that high will have a disproportionate effect on the ship's stability.

Lastly, the rear rangefinder - the one just in front of the 'X' turret - I'm not sure, but I think it can't actually see backwards - if you lift it up a little (or make the turret design a little less tall) it'll be able to see past the turret.

Regards,
Adam

_________________
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
[ img ]
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 12 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]