Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
21st Century Super Multi Purpose Nuclear Missile Battleship http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=4857 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | JSB [ January 27th, 2014, 11:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | 21st Century Super Multi Purpose Nuclear Missile Battleship |
After reading lots of threads in the forum Congress has been persuaded to fund a 21st century battleship because we might need 16 inch guns to sink the atomic space battleship Yamato. The Navy wants to build the cheapest thing with 16inch guns, so we can spend the rest of the cash on something useful, we give you BM1 the thing nobody wants but gets built anyway ( and yes the reactor got cut and RAM is all the missiles remaining but I’m sure the brochure still has super and multi purpose in it ! ). I’m not sure I like the style of 21st century stealth ships (to much of the important stuff like electronics is hidden) please tell me if I have made to many errors with the systems on this one, or if I’m not allowed 2 threads etc (but didn’t want this one to muck up my real interest). thanks JSB |
Author: | acelanceloet [ January 28th, 2014, 10:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 21st Century Super Multi Purpose Nuclear Missile Battles |
you have no chance of battling space battleship yamato without the wave motion gun, you get that right? |
Author: | Judah14 [ January 28th, 2014, 11:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 21st Century Super Multi Purpose Nuclear Missile Battles |
if you want this nuclear missile battleship to look like one you must put a VLS for the missiles and put the missiles on the drawing. Here are my suggestions for missiles to arm the ship: |
Author: | Thiel [ January 28th, 2014, 11:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 21st Century Super Multi Purpose Nuclear Missile Battles |
You're probably going to need something rather bigger since you're aiming for potentially high orbits |
Author: | Lebroba [ January 28th, 2014, 11:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 21st Century Super Multi Purpose Nuclear Missile Battles |
How do you "sink" a space ship? Nice drawing btw |
Author: | Lebroba [ January 28th, 2014, 11:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 21st Century Super Multi Purpose Nuclear Missile Battles |
EMRG @ 300 MJ should achieve earth orbit with suffcient velocity excess to cause kenetic damage to starship hulls. YOLO! |
Author: | JSB [ January 28th, 2014, 2:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 21st Century Super Multi Purpose Nuclear Missile Battles |
Congress was not amused..... JSB |
Author: | jabba [ January 28th, 2014, 2:29 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: 21st Century Super Multi Purpose Nuclear Missile Battles | |
Congress was not amused.....
Haha!
|
Author: | KimWerner [ February 3rd, 2014, 2:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 21st Century Super Multi Purpose Nuclear Missile Battles |
JSB you have an issue with your creditting. It's general in your different topic - wonder why no one had mentioned it - the vessel itself is creditted in one parantesis - (name 1, name 2 etc.) - with the original artist mentioned first. As for the CoA it's the same though "by courtesy" isn't neccessary especially because it ought to have some communication between the two drawers first. I'm not very fond of the quality of the changing of my original seal though I can't and won't forbid it. But it's not with my courtesy |
Author: | JSB [ February 3rd, 2014, 2:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 21st Century Super Multi Purpose Nuclear Missile Battles |
Thanks for the tip with crediting didn't really understand what CoA ment so I just copied it (or realise about the 1,2,3 thing). I will get on fixing all my posts, I you really don’t like my messing up your badge please tell me and I will delete it (especially as this ship is really just a silly joke). Thanks JSB |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |