Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
Razgriz BSG-27
Post subject: Size relative to speed , in the age of sailPosted: July 14th, 2012, 10:50 pm
Offline
Posts: 131
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 10:02 pm
How , large could someone make a ship with period materials, but modern knowledge of shipbuilding and naval architecture etc., or rather how many guns could a ship carry and still be relatively fast say about 15 knots

I am led to believe this comes down almost entirely to hull design


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Size relative to speed , in the age of sailPosted: July 15th, 2012, 1:43 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
In the world of traditional sailing 15kt is drag-racing fast. You might be able to achieve it in a large frigate. A ship of the line would be lucky to achieve six.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Size relative to speed , in the age of sailPosted: July 15th, 2012, 1:57 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Razgriz BSG-27 wrote:
How , large could someone make a ship with period materials, but modern knowledge of shipbuilding and naval architecture etc.,
It's not so much the knowledge but the materials, so basically you're going to end up with a period frigate regardless.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Razgriz BSG-27
Post subject: Re: Size relative to speed , in the age of sailPosted: July 15th, 2012, 2:53 am
Offline
Posts: 131
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 10:02 pm
okay


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: Size relative to speed , in the age of sailPosted: July 15th, 2012, 7:05 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
As said before a frigate is the best bet for `~15knots,any faster and a armed clipper would be more likely

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Size relative to speed , in the age of sailPosted: July 15th, 2012, 10:58 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
also, the amount of guns is exactly the factor this ship would have to be based on. in the age of sail, the privateers were able to fight off merchants, but were too fast to be catched by a frigate. a frigate would not stand a chance against a ship of the line, but was fast enough to outmanoeuvre and outrun it. an ship of the line could deal an massive blow, but would have been to slow to catch the before 2 in a 1vs1 fight.

for the limits on sailing ship designs, you should look at the last wooden clippers. those were the limit to what was possible with those materials, both in size and in speed.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Size relative to speed , in the age of sailPosted: July 15th, 2012, 12:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Well actually, the clippers were composite ships. Iron keels and frames with wooden planking.
Also, cross bracing was invented in the early parts of the 19th century which is why the Jylland is 20m longer than the Victory, despite the fact that they're build using the same materials.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Size relative to speed , in the age of sailPosted: July 15th, 2012, 12:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
the last wooden clippers. or in other words, the early clippers, before iron came into use ;)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Size relative to speed , in the age of sailPosted: July 15th, 2012, 1:11 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
acelanceloet wrote:
the last wooden clippers. or in other words, the early clippers, before iron came into use ;)
But they wouldn't have been strong enough to carry anything heavier than a token handful of insurance guns

With iron framing you might be able to carry a few useful guns on a clipper type ship.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Size relative to speed , in the age of sailPosted: July 15th, 2012, 1:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
correct. which brings us back at what I said earlier: you can have the guns or the speed, not both :P we are really speeking the same language here thiel ;)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]