Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
Littorial Combat Ship http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1247 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Paul Carl [ May 24th, 2011, 2:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Littorial Combat Ship |
Please guide me on this design. |
Author: | Carnac [ May 24th, 2011, 4:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Littorial Combat Ship |
You do realize that both LCSs are American... Right? |
Author: | klagldsf [ May 24th, 2011, 4:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Littorial Combat Ship |
You do realize this is a personal design... Right? |
Author: | Paul Carl [ May 24th, 2011, 2:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Littorial Combat Ship |
Yes I know the Americans has ones but this is of my own design. |
Author: | acelanceloet [ May 24th, 2011, 2:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Littorial Combat Ship |
found one problem: the flagpole you put on the I-mast can't fit there, because it pierces an radar right now. |
Author: | Carnac [ May 24th, 2011, 2:38 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Littorial Combat Ship | |
You do realize this is a personal design... Right?
Oh. My bad. LCS-1 was what confused me.
|
Author: | Paul Carl [ May 24th, 2011, 4:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Littorial Combat Ship |
Thanks Acelanceloet I will fix that tonight, thanks Carnac |
Author: | Paul Carl [ May 24th, 2011, 10:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Littorial Combat Ship |
There I fixed that glitch |
Author: | Rodondo [ May 24th, 2011, 10:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Littorial Combat Ship |
Hi Just a few points, looks a bit short(bow-wise),gun looks too far forwards and the superstructure might need more detail but good start! |
Author: | alexsa [ May 28th, 2011, 10:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Littorial Combat Ship |
A couple of issues. The shaft driven Z drive or truster you have used is a tug system and ntoofor speed. The AGS is a big piece of kit and looks a tad small If this is an LCS in the sense of the current versions then we are talking light weight hull and your hull area would be greater, other wise she may be a tad slow or impractical as the deadweight of the LCS is quite low. cheers |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |