Out of all technicality it is an RC. I was actually considering getting that, so that I could learn how to fly an RC copter (I want to upgrade to a large scale huey, maybe 1/10th scale).
Anyways, my tank is almost finished.
![[ img ]](http://i737.photobucket.com/albums/xx15/EZGO394/FDMBT1-1.png)
| Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
| IoT (Isle of Texas) http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=28 |
Page 10 of 18 |
| Author: | Mitchell van Os [ August 13th, 2010, 12:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
That toy chinook you showed, it only 2 leveled per side otherwise it can not fly as a toy. |
|
| Author: | ezgo394 [ August 13th, 2010, 4:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
It is just to keep it stable. I have seen RC Chinooks that were actually only a tandem rotor and they flew pretty well. |
|
| Author: | klagldsf [ August 13th, 2010, 5:04 pm ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) | |
That toy chinook you showed, it only 2 leveled per side otherwise it can not fly as a toy.
Key word there, TOY. It does not even deserve to be dignified as an r/c aircraft.
|
||
| Author: | ezgo394 [ August 13th, 2010, 9:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
Out of all technicality it is an RC. I was actually considering getting that, so that I could learn how to fly an RC copter (I want to upgrade to a large scale huey, maybe 1/10th scale). Anyways, my tank is almost finished.
|
|
| Author: | Mitchell van Os [ August 13th, 2010, 10:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
1. That thing is 5 times bigger then the truck 2. That thing is as big as an Maus tank (wich is heavy) 3. Your tank carrier cant go through the corner, exept if its wheels can rotate, but that comes with another problem. You cant lift that much a small spot like this. 4. You probaly need a bigger truck to get this load any ferther? 5. Why such a massive tank for such a small caliber? It looks like an barrel from the ariete. And the ariete is way smaller. |
|
| Author: | ezgo394 [ August 13th, 2010, 11:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
I haven't replaced the truck yet. I'm still working on it and yes it is bigger. The truck is also there for size comparisions. The tank is 40 feet long compared to the Abrams which is 32. It uses a 120mm but I might upgrade. The truck is only for long distance transport, so corners aren't a problem. |
|
| Author: | JLDogg [ August 14th, 2010, 4:05 pm ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) | |
The truck is only for long distance transport, so corners aren't a problem.
Staight line highway???? 
|
||
| Author: | ezgo394 [ August 14th, 2010, 4:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
Like I said, I haven't replaced the truck yet. I might make a modified M1070. |
|
| Author: | Mitchell van Os [ August 15th, 2010, 9:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
32 feet and 40 feet is still a big difference. Plus check the height. Leopard's love to eat it, plus its an easy target. |
|
| Author: | acelanceloet [ August 15th, 2010, 9:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
stop making that truck bigger! just make the tank smaller! it's design's great, but this one is 3-4 meters high, and normal tanks are like 1,5-2,5 meter if I'm right. |
|
| Page 10 of 18 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|