Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 25  [ 242 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 525 »
Author Message
ABetterName
Post subject: Re: Crovenian EmpirePosted: April 19th, 2015, 9:13 pm
Offline
Posts: 372
Joined: April 16th, 2015, 7:39 pm
Location: Konugenshafn, Nyrdanmark
JSB wrote:
No but a BC is by definition something with big guns
I suppose I'm not quite used to WW1 classes yet, but I always thought of battlecruisers as fast battleships/pocket battleships.
Quote:
and I don't think the wavy lines look neat on the belt
Fixed that.

_________________
"The first phase of the operation did not go as planned." - Anonymous
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Crovenian EmpirePosted: April 19th, 2015, 9:18 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7503
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
Quote:
but I always thought of battlecruisers as fast battleships/pocket battleships.
which is what your drawing is not as well.

[ img ]
fast battleship

[ img ]
pocket battleship

battlecruisers are, according to wikipedia:
Quote:
A battlecruiser, or battle cruiser, was a large capital ship built in the first half of the 20th century. They were similar in size and cost to a battleship, and typically carried the same kind of heavy guns, but generally carried less armour and were faster. The first battlecruisers were designed in the United Kingdom in the first decade of the century, as a development of the armoured cruiser, at the same time the dreadnought succeeded the pre-dreadnought battleship. The original aim of the battlecruiser was to hunt down slower, older armoured cruisers and destroy them with heavy gunfire. However, as more and more battlecruisers were built, they increasingly became used alongside the better-protected battleships.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ABetterName
Post subject: Re: Crovenian EmpirePosted: April 19th, 2015, 9:20 pm
Offline
Posts: 372
Joined: April 16th, 2015, 7:39 pm
Location: Konugenshafn, Nyrdanmark
It is definitely faster than a battleship of it's time, but you are right, it is no fast battleship.

I've relabeled it as an armored cruiser.

_________________
"The first phase of the operation did not go as planned." - Anonymous
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ABetterName
Post subject: Re: Crovenian EmpirePosted: April 21st, 2015, 1:44 am
Offline
Posts: 372
Joined: April 16th, 2015, 7:39 pm
Location: Konugenshafn, Nyrdanmark
Something with a bit less guns, but still important.

[ img ]
[ img ]

Edit: Added some things to the deck.

_________________
"The first phase of the operation did not go as planned." - Anonymous
[ img ]


Last edited by ABetterName on April 21st, 2015, 8:33 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
JSB
Post subject: Re: Crovenian EmpirePosted: April 21st, 2015, 10:02 am
Offline
Posts: 1433
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 5:33 pm
I like the big problem I can see is that your hospital ship (and 1912) has TT tubes at the bow and stern :P .


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Crovenian EmpirePosted: April 21st, 2015, 10:16 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Maybe its a disguised Raider JSB?

ABetterName:
The circles on the lower hull of the ship are submerged torpedo tubes, which as JSB remarks, should not be there on a 'liner'.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ABetterName
Post subject: Re: Crovenian EmpirePosted: April 21st, 2015, 3:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 372
Joined: April 16th, 2015, 7:39 pm
Location: Konugenshafn, Nyrdanmark
Ah, so that's what those are.

I've removed them.

_________________
"The first phase of the operation did not go as planned." - Anonymous
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Crovenian EmpirePosted: April 21st, 2015, 6:12 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
I hadn't commentd so far, but seeing a liner, is more my cup of tea, so to speak.
Your liner looks wrong for a ship of the period. It is too compressed, the superstructure being too uniform, for a liner. Look at the archive for liners of the period, like the Kaiser Wilhelm der Grosse
[ img ]
or the Laconia
[ img ]
Also note, your lack of llifeboats, derricks, vents and headroom. Some portholes are too close one above the other

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ABetterName
Post subject: Re: Crovenian EmpirePosted: April 21st, 2015, 7:03 pm
Offline
Posts: 372
Joined: April 16th, 2015, 7:39 pm
Location: Konugenshafn, Nyrdanmark
I based quite a bit of the design off the Britannic, which is of the time period.

Edit: There would be more lifeboats between the ones visible.

Edit Edit: I'd also like to point out that in this AU, Great Britain does not exist and neither does Titanic, so the requirement to have enough lifeboats for all passengers was never made.

_________________
"The first phase of the operation did not go as planned." - Anonymous
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Crovenian EmpirePosted: April 21st, 2015, 7:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7503
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f252/ ... c_1914.png this brittanic?
note that you also have no machinery on board, as your aft funnel is directly on top of where the engines are. if it is an dummy funnel, IIRC those were only fitted there to improve the balance of the ship, not worsen it?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 25  [ 242 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 525 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]