| Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
| more Royal Navy http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1109 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Philbob [ April 30th, 2011, 7:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | more Royal Navy |
The corrected CVF (and hopfully final) http://baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/pu ... asheet.pdf a new LHD design http://baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/pu ... asheet.pdf |
|
| Author: | KimWerner [ April 30th, 2011, 10:16 am ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: more Royal Navy | |
The corrected CVF (and hopfully final)
Thanks for the url-threads. Very informative and exciting http://baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/pu ... asheet.pdf a new LHD design http://baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/pu ... asheet.pdf  If it's possible to find drawings from starboardside it would be two nice challenges to draw in SB 
|
||
| Author: | Portsmouth Bill [ April 30th, 2011, 11:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: more Royal Navy |
Yes, the latest in the media is that one of them will be redisgned to accept the USN version of the JSF; so, the cost is really taking off now. |
|
| Author: | TimothyC [ April 30th, 2011, 4:58 pm ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: more Royal Navy | |
Yes, the latest in the media is that one of them will be redisgned to accept the USN version of the JSF; so, the cost is really taking off now.
Both CVFs will be fitted for the F-35C. QE will be built in STOVL config, and PoW will be built as CATOBAR. Following PoW's Commissioning, QE will go back into refit and get converted to CATOBAR mode. This was covered here, when the defense review came out.
|
||
| Author: | Portsmouth Bill [ April 30th, 2011, 7:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: more Royal Navy |
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=92116 http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/ne ... 469951.stm |
|
| Author: | TimothyC [ May 1st, 2011, 1:28 am ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: more Royal Navy | |
|
||
| Author: | Portsmouth Bill [ May 1st, 2011, 6:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: more Royal Navy |
And all the rest! Eisenhower got it right
|
|
| Author: | klagldsf [ May 2nd, 2011, 5:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: more Royal Navy |
The LHD appears to be an Ocean follow-on. |
|
| Author: | Bombhead [ May 6th, 2011, 4:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: more Royal Navy |
Alas we Brits have a poor record of cost over runs especially when it comes to carriers.Victorious' 1950-58 re-fit was projected to cost £2.5m the actuall cost came in at £30.5m,more than the price of a new build ship. 
|
|
| Author: | Philbob [ May 6th, 2011, 11:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: more Royal Navy |
to be fair your government made a huge mistake by immediately retiring her after the refit |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|