Forgive me if i ask.
There are any plans to show Forrestall as originally designed? I saw some sketches featuring her planned straight deck layout somewhere on the board a couple of months ago, but I cannot fid them right now.
_________________ My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I was thinking of taking that one on (maybe with some help) while work is being done on the forrestal (as the underwater hull is the same, and the upper hull as well up to some point)
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
I've checked my available sources (such as Friedman, Jane's and Terzibatschisch, and they all agree about the LWL being 990 ft (301.75 meters). However, the individual OA lengths of the four sisters did vary, as I've stated in a previous post. I cannot explain exactly how this deviance should be articulated in a drawing of each sisters, though. (Mind you, most details about hulls and underwater bodies are still classified with regards to the so-called supercarriers, beginning with the Forrestal-class!)
_________________ My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
ok, somebody who's name I do not recognise is doing quite a bit of good work on the forrestal in the dropbox folder. as I don't feel that work should be done alone, can that somebody identify himself (here or by PM) so the help I offered, and maybe that of others here, can come in handy when needed?
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin