Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 44 of 123  [ 1226 posts ]  Go to page « 142 43 44 45 46123 »
Author Message
HMS Sophia
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: September 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Offline
Posts: 863
Joined: May 6th, 2011, 10:34 am
This thread: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1912


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ONI-Defense
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: September 18th, 2011, 2:23 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 404
Joined: May 10th, 2011, 11:13 pm
Location: Oviedo, Florida
AH-3 Blackfoot, scaled down from DarkProxy's and Bagera3005's design.
Attachment:
ah3blackfoot.PNG

_________________
Current Worklist: http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=5562


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: September 21st, 2011, 8:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
And now for something completely different. Mitsubishi J2M was a land based fighter but, what about hypothetically a carrier version. It's possible ?

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: September 21st, 2011, 9:32 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
I'd probably say possible but not likely. The thing was meant to go after heavies up high, it wouldn't be stressed for carrier work, the visibility from the cockpit (if Il-2 is to be believed isn't exactly great either) What did you have in mind for it to do?

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: September 22nd, 2011, 7:47 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Give him a fleet interceptor role, tailhook, folding wings. But what about fuel ? J2M has short range, only 560 km.

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: September 22nd, 2011, 8:30 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Drop tanks would help to some extent but the thing is so small there's really not much room for more fuel. You could strip all the armour off of it as well as maybe two of the 20mm guns.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: September 22nd, 2011, 2:06 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Blackbuck wrote:
Drop tanks would help to some extent but the thing is so small there's really not much room for more fuel. You could strip all the armour off of it as well as maybe two of the 20mm guns.
Yeah, you right. I try to make comparisons with other fighters, P-47, F6F or N1K Rex. P-47 is similar to size and weight, also engine has almost identic power. Maybe if change position of one pair 20 mm to the engine cowling we can make some room for more fuel tanks. Also striping armour ? I don't know, for me it's not a good idea.

One more thing, drop tanks in carrier operation. Any fighter in WWII us that ?

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: September 22nd, 2011, 3:18 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
RN and USN did. I'm sure the IJN would of too. When you consider that the Japanese hardly ever armoured their planes to improve manoeuvrability I guess it's feasible they could do that with the Jack...
20mms wouldn't work in the cowling I don't think, they're simply too large. Though you could probably fit a pair of 13.2mm MGs in there...

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: September 22nd, 2011, 3:38 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
La-7 use 20 mm on engine cowling. Maybe you right with that armour, leave only for cockpit and strip rest. When we do that, we increse range ... 800 with fuel tanks ?

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: September 22nd, 2011, 5:50 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Would seem a reasonable estimate for range. The La-7 and Fw-190Ds (that had MG151s in the nose) could probably get away with having them because of the extra space between the engine and cockpit, the J2M has a much smaller ratio between the two.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 44 of 123  [ 1226 posts ]  Return to “Parts Sheets Discussion” | Go to page « 142 43 44 45 46123 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]