Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 3  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 »
Author Message
Krakatoa
Post subject: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 1916-37Posted: September 12th, 2014, 10:48 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
I'm just posting the side view to begin with to get some reaction to the viability of the design.

My thought is that the RN would just continue to build these in place of the Admirals, and if someone shoots Jackie Fisher, the Courageous class too. Any uncompleted hulls at wars end could still be converted to aircraft carriers. The bigger hull and deeper hull of these ships would make an interesting conversion.

Drawings for this thread, 1916 side and top, 1937 side and top, 1926/7 CV side and top, 1940 CV side and top views.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
JSB
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 12th, 2014, 11:46 pm
Offline
Posts: 1433
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 5:33 pm
I like nice to compare similar ships coming from different starts (my speeded up R v your toughed up BC).


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 13th, 2014, 12:38 am
Online
User avatar
Posts: 2108
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
There will be more. I am currently working on this thing: http://wolfsshipyard.com/Misc/WolfsDen/ ... /queen.htm


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 13th, 2014, 12:46 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Karle94
That's a good place to start, with one of CanisD's nice personal designs.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 13th, 2014, 1:18 am
Online
User avatar
Posts: 2108
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
I am going to take some liberties to change a few aspects with the design.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 13th, 2014, 12:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Added top view to 1916 as built drawing.
Added side view for CV 1927.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 13th, 2014, 2:36 pm
Offline
Posts: 7193
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Its a nice looking design.
I think you would need to increase the beam slightly to allow for the topweight of the extra turret.
I like the concept of this fast BB, 28kts is not too fast and so does not need masses of hp. R&R had 112,000hp and had 42 boilers!
I wonder if there is scope to upgrade the armour, something with a 12in thick belt and maybe a 3-1.5in deck would be slightly better perhaps.
The carrier version looks good, you might want to add more larger spaces to ventilate the hangars though. I suppose about 30-40 aircraft could be accommodated.

Karl94, good luck with the Queen Victoria, I agree that was one of Canis's best works. Oddly enough the Royal Sovereigns were first envisioned as 5x2 15in armed versions of the QE class, but the Admiralty wanted a length no greater than the Iron Dukes and it proved impossible. Also, the firepower from a 4x2 15in broadside was considered much superior to a 5x2 13.5in broadside so the need wasn't really needed.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
csatahajos
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 13th, 2014, 10:59 pm
Offline
Posts: 79
Joined: January 10th, 2013, 10:52 pm
Karle,

actually Burt's book mentions there was Design 'X' IIRC for the Renown class BCs that was only 15 ft longer and had one extra turret, so your concept is not far from what was thought up by the original designers.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 15th, 2014, 2:25 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Completed side and top view of CV conversion completed 1927. (I have changed the side view using a later drawing by Hood).

Being completed later than the original Battlecruisers the aircraft carrier conversions had better machinery fitted that allowed the ships to keep the same speed as the BC's.

I would envisage a total class of 8 ships. 4 BC and 4 CV. Renown, Repulse, Reliant, Resistance (BC's). Lord Kitchener, Lord Gambier, Lord Cochrane, Lord Hawke (CV's).

Thanks for the comments guys.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 15th, 2014, 9:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
A very beautiful design, and she would have actually been a lot more useful than the battlecruisers.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 3  [ 21 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]