Now, the Springsharp:
Displacement:
11,590 t light; 12,237 t standard; 12,518 t normal; 12,743 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
405.00 ft / 405.00 ft x 90.00 ft (Bulges 120.00 ft) x 15.00 ft (normal load)
123.44 m / 123.44 m x 27.43 m (Bulges 36.58 m) x 4.57 m
Armament:
4 - 12.00" / 305 mm guns (2x2 guns), 864.00lbs / 391.90kg shells, 1912 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 1 raised mount
18 - 7.00" / 178 mm guns in single mounts, 171.50lbs / 77.79kg shells, 1906 Model
Breech loading guns in casemate mounts
on side, all amidships
10 guns in hull casemates - Limited use in all but light seas
8 - 3.00" / 76.2 mm guns in single mounts, 13.50lbs / 6.12kg shells, 1919 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
Weight of broadside 6,651 lbs / 3,017 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 100
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 11.0" / 279 mm 182.01 ft / 55.48 m 11.38 ft / 3.47 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 69 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead and Bulges:
2.00" / 51 mm 182.01 ft / 55.48 m 14.15 ft / 4.31 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 10.0" / 254 mm 6.00" / 152 mm 9.00" / 229 mm
2nd: 6.00" / 152 mm - -
3rd: 2.00" / 51 mm - -
- Armour deck: 5.00" / 127 mm, Conning tower: 10.00" / 254 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 2 shafts, 3,368 shp / 2,513 Kw = 12.00 kts
Range 5,000nm at 8.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 506 tons
Complement:
591 - 769
Cost:
£2.445 million / $9.781 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 831 tons, 6.6 %
Armour: 5,165 tons, 41.3 %
- Belts: 1,177 tons, 9.4 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 191 tons, 1.5 %
- Armament: 1,212 tons, 9.7 %
- Armour Deck: 2,468 tons, 19.7 %
- Conning Tower: 116 tons, 0.9 %
Machinery: 120 tons, 1.0 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 5,475 tons, 43.7 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 928 tons, 7.4 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
28,039 lbs / 12,718 Kg = 32.5 x 12.0 " / 305 mm shells or 8.1 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.47
Metacentric height 8.2 ft / 2.5 m
Roll period: 17.6 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 95 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.14
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.50
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0.601
Length to Beam Ratio: 3.38 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 20.12 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 28 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 63
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 0.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 24.50 ft / 7.47 m
- Forecastle (28 %): 23.00 ft / 7.01 m
- Mid (50 %): 14.09 ft / 4.29 m
- Quarterdeck (28 %): 14.09 ft / 4.29 m
- Stern: 14.09 ft / 4.29 m
- Average freeboard: 17.71 ft / 5.40 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 69.1 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 140.3 %
Waterplane Area: 26,684 Square feet or 2,479 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 104 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 152 lbs/sq ft or 743 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.92
- Longitudinal: 2.10
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather
In an alternate version, I'm increasing the speed to max of 15 kts and cruising to 10 kts, but for a CDS, I'm not sure if the extra is worth it.
_________________ We can't stop here--this is Bat country!
If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.
Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.
"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."
|