Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
Selous Class http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=279 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | rifleman [ October 5th, 2010, 6:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Selous Class |
My design for a Rhodesian Navy Frigate for AU |
Author: | acelanceloet [ October 5th, 2010, 6:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Selous Class |
a few questions: why the heightened VLS? what is that anti-ship missile? and a few comments: the colouring on the screw joint is wrong, only the screw itself should be yellow overhang just behind the bridge? reddish line from the template is still existing at the edge of your drawing, should be deleted on all other points it is rather good looking IMHO, and it is good to see someone else using dutch systems in an AU |
Author: | TimothyC [ October 5th, 2010, 6:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Selous Class |
Without a long range 3D radar (much less any dedicated illuminators) the Standard and ESSM analogs are not going to be very effective. |
Author: | Mitchell van Os [ October 5th, 2010, 7:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Selous Class |
Exchange the WM 22 for the Smart-S. 2D vs 3D. You will be more effective, plus better radar range/raw echo to be converted to digital screen. And also you got the thing you need. The height of the enemy. Without that the missile will go there and then, yeah... i dont know actually |
Author: | rifleman [ October 5th, 2010, 9:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Selous Class |
look on the AU missiles sheet they are Thales TMS 11 & 22 SAM and SSM's Thales TMS 01 |
Author: | erik_t [ October 7th, 2010, 7:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Selous Class |
The missile illuminators you're using right now are probably sufficient for the smaller point-defense (ish) missile, but almost surely lack the power aperture necessary to take advantage of the larger-airframe SAM. I would replace them with substantially larger illuminators. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |