Shipbucket
http://67.205.157.234/forums/

Teardrop Conning Towers vs "Standard Style" Conning towers
http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2433		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  nighthunter [ January 6th, 2012, 4:02 am ]
Post subject:  Teardrop Conning Towers vs "Standard Style" Conning towers
Okay, which one looks best?
Author:  erik_t [ January 6th, 2012, 4:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Teardrop Conning Towers vs "Standard Style" Conning towe
Aesthetically, I've always preferred the more two-dimensional and upright Western style. I make no suggestion as to the technical superiority.
Author:  Scifibug [ January 6th, 2012, 5:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Teardrop Conning Towers vs "Standard Style" Conning towe
Aesthetically? I can't say. The "standard" conning tower look more "normal" to me but that's because I'm more familiar with US subs. But I think its significant that some future blocks of the Virginia are shown with teardrop shaped cons.
Very good comparisons by the way.
Author:  nighthunter [ January 6th, 2012, 6:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Teardrop Conning Towers vs "Standard Style" Conning towe
Apparently it helps reduce certain problem areas with submarines, I am just keeping myself busy and I blame Van for starting me on it. I like both, and usually prefer the western style sail, but if the Russians had something with the teardrop then it would make sense to use it.
Author:  Maple-leaf-Warrior [ January 6th, 2012, 7:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Teardrop Conning Towers vs "Standard Style" Conning towe
I like the teardrop, I think it mixes well with the more western looking hull and creates a unique looking sub.
Author:  ALVAMA [ January 6th, 2012, 8:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Teardrop Conning Towers vs "Standard Style" Conning towe
Teardrop/Russiam one
Author:  Rhade [ January 6th, 2012, 9:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Teardrop Conning Towers vs "Standard Style" Conning towe
Yep, russian look more advance.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/