Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
Noname Class Family of Destroyers and Frigates from Nowhere http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1479 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | hudavendigar [ July 2nd, 2011, 11:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Noname Class Family of Destroyers and Frigates from Nowhere |
A fleet defence destroyer, a land-attack destroyer and an escort/patrol frigate. Certainly inspired by similar classes of ships... |
Author: | Rodondo [ July 3rd, 2011, 2:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Noname Class Family of Destroyers and Frigates from Nowh |
Has this been saved as a .png? or has your image hosting done the pixelation? |
Author: | Carnac [ July 3rd, 2011, 2:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Noname Class Family of Destroyers and Frigates from Nowh |
I think that an RHIB would be more suitable then a solid boat for a ship of this age and size. |
Author: | Rodondo [ July 3rd, 2011, 4:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Noname Class Family of Destroyers and Frigates from Nowh |
What carnac said, except you could have a single solid boat on the destroyer, but Rhibs are generally more used on frigates and smaller combatants |
Author: | hudavendigar [ July 3rd, 2011, 5:59 am ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Noname Class Family of Destroyers and Frigates from Nowh | |
Has this been saved as a .png? or has your image hosting done the pixelation?
I've saved it as a PNG file and uploaded to PhotoBucket.
|
Author: | Thiel [ July 3rd, 2011, 6:18 am ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Noname Class Family of Destroyers and Frigates from Nowh | |
What carnac said, except you could have a single solid boat on the destroyer, but Rhibs are generally more used on frigates and smaller combatants
Not really. RHIBs are used pretty much everywhere these days, the only exceptions being ships that needs to move substantial pieces of materiel around, such as carriers or supply ships etc.
|
Author: | Rodondo [ July 3rd, 2011, 6:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Noname Class Family of Destroyers and Frigates from Nowh |
Ah I stand corrected, thanks Thiel. Also not sure about the hangars, not enough space (clutter caused by weapons) Might want to check your settings on Photobucket if it's doing this |
Author: | hudavendigar [ July 3rd, 2011, 9:42 am ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Noname Class Family of Destroyers and Frigates from Nowh | |
Also not sure about the hangars, not enough space (clutter caused by weapons)
This is why I used folded views of helicopters The most cluttered one should be the land-attack destroyer. I intended to place two 127/64 mm guns, and a 32-cell VLS in between, in front of the hangars. Corridors and gangways through them should be a bigger problem than the size of the hangar is. |
Author: | Rodondo [ July 3rd, 2011, 9:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Noname Class Family of Destroyers and Frigates from Nowh |
Ah, second time I've been corrected |
Author: | hudavendigar [ July 3rd, 2011, 3:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Noname Class Family of Destroyers and Frigates from Nowh |
Here is Version 1.1: |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |