| Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
| Littoral Combat Corvette http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1315 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| Author: | sebu [ June 5th, 2011, 12:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Littoral Combat Corvette |
Updated picture of an old idea. Again, its infuenced by many SB artists, yet Navarchos is credited since using his Kanaris class mp-corvette in top view. |
|
| Author: | acelanceloet [ June 5th, 2011, 12:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Littoral Combat Corvette |
the I-mast you put on here won't work. I suggest using an I-mast 50 or 100 of you want an smaller one of that family. the flagpole and nav radar arm are going through positions were they can't be as well. and that oto 76 top view... I am going to work on an better one right away. btw, I don't really see use for that mortar midships, and that folding stealth plating on top of your VLS/MLS midships is very heavy and of not much use. while overall quite a nice idea, there are some flaws.... |
|
| Author: | erik_t [ June 5th, 2011, 4:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Littoral Combat Corvette |
Two large RHIBs seems excessive on a ship this size, in light of the volume they are taking up in the superstructure. I agree that the mortar should probably be landed. There's something to be said for such a system, but I don't think you can justify it on a hull this size. |
|
| Author: | Colombamike [ June 5th, 2011, 6:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Littoral Combat Corvette |
Pics deleted |
|
| Author: | Thiel [ June 5th, 2011, 6:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Littoral Combat Corvette |
Why should he replace the 76mm? The Fins has a history of fitting large guns on small boats. If you can support a helicopter, you can support an UAV. Where would you fit said multi mission capability? Minesweeping is not an option for a ship like this. |
|
| Author: | sebu [ June 5th, 2011, 7:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Littoral Combat Corvette |
Thanks for comments. So few quick corrections made; I'm working on with camo and width. But may I ask: why not mortar? Considering all different ammo it can fire and conditions here. Update: narrowed and Millenium gun added. |
|
| Author: | Carnac [ June 5th, 2011, 8:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Littoral Combat Corvette |
Nice. I think your 57mm gun is incorrect though, the USN Parts Sheet has a correct version. Is the empty "slot" above the hangar for mission modules? Perhaps you could draw them. |
|
| Author: | Thiel [ June 5th, 2011, 8:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Littoral Combat Corvette |
Why did you remove the Millennium gun? |
|
| Author: | acelanceloet [ June 5th, 2011, 8:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Littoral Combat Corvette |
and what is that UCAV? |
|
| Author: | TimothyC [ June 5th, 2011, 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Littoral Combat Corvette |
Ace: It's SeaMOS |
|
| Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|