» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 5  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »
[Print view]
Author Message
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...Posted: February 23rd, 2011, 7:47 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
BrockPaine wrote:
Incidentally, here are some photoshops I did a few years back of a USN fast battleship/fully armoured battlecruiser, in case anyone's interested. It's intended as a 12x14" gunned, 30-knot BC.
Looks like someone photoshopped my Alaska. Are they from the closed altnavy site?
In an AU, it could have been a predecessor to the Lexington BCs.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BrockPaine
Post subject: Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...Posted: February 23rd, 2011, 10:58 pm
Offline
Posts: 248
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 1:20 pm
Ashley wrote:
BrockPaine wrote:
Incidentally, here are some photoshops I did a few years back of a USN fast battleship/fully armoured battlecruiser, in case anyone's interested. It's intended as a 12x14" gunned, 30-knot BC.
Looks like someone photoshopped my Alaska. Are they from the closed altnavy site?
In an AU, it could have been a predecessor to the Lexington BCs.
As I said, I did them myself for a USN fast battlecruiser design.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...Posted: February 25th, 2011, 7:40 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
BrockPaine wrote:
As I said, I did them myself for a USN fast battlecruiser design.
Sorry, I didn't realize that. I like those Photoshops very much, they look very realistic.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: 20s Alaska after fullscale refitPosted: March 6th, 2011, 11:54 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Ashley wrote:
The 20s Alaska after a late-war fullscale refit.
[ img ]
I agree the aft of the early Alaskas is mid 40s style. Should be revised, too. Oh, and yes, I know how the above looks now. Would you believe, it was derivated from the first 20s Alaska drawing?
I believe the radar fit here is far too modern for 1935. Also, the midline 5"/38 is (like erik_t said) untenable. If anything, remove the aircraft-handling cranes and replace them with a 5"/38 mount. Not really sure why Midnightnova is credited in that drawing either.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...Posted: March 8th, 2011, 12:24 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
The correct radar fit for 1935 would be zero. CXAM didn't go to sea until 1940.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...Posted: March 9th, 2011, 11:11 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
If you follow the threads past you will recognize, the drawing is obsolete.
Here comes the corrected 1920s Alaska in 1945s refit:
[ img ]
Now with fitting bow and stern. The old fashioned 12" turrets are obviously smaller than the original ones. Must have been hell to work in them. They are taken from Redhorses BB-26 South Carolina and refined.
After looking some minutes at the drawing, I think the fore 5"-turret would be removed later replaced by some Bofors 40mm.
Edit: I still have overseen the aircraft crane...

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...Posted: March 9th, 2011, 4:02 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
I think the superstructure has been far too "crammed together". The funnel is far too close to the citadel.

Interesting redraw, though.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...Posted: March 18th, 2011, 9:21 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Funnel slightly revised, aircraft crane removed, boat crane added, some minor details.
[ img ]

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...Posted: March 18th, 2011, 4:39 pm
I like it very much!
Top
[Quote]
dreadnaught111
Post subject: Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...Posted: April 3rd, 2011, 10:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 70
Joined: March 26th, 2011, 9:37 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida
I think we've got a winner! :mrgreen:

P.S. I think they should be called something other than the "Alaska"-Class. Maybe "Virginia" would work a bit better?

_________________
Fan of Dreadnaughts, Super-Dreadnaughts, Fast Battleships and Battlecruisers.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 5  [ 42 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]