Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB-55 http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=5435 |
Page 4 of 16 |
Author: | Colosseum [ July 11th, 2014, 8:06 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB- | |
Sad, worrying, upseting & disastrous
People are allowed to draw whatever they want. Those who do not draw anything have no say in the matter whatsoever. Please do not make these kinds of comments...
Sad to see some time lost in drawn personnal drawing (useless, with TOO many design errors/mistakes) when so many "real" or "never-were" designs are not drawn on Shipbucket You have the (drawing) ability But You can Not be Serious |
Author: | WWII44 [ July 12th, 2014, 5:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB- |
any chance you could give a tutorial on drawing top-down views David? |
Author: | David Latuch [ July 12th, 2014, 8:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB- |
So here now are both the Bow and Stern views of the USS New Hampshire (BB-55): |
Author: | KHT [ July 12th, 2014, 8:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB- |
I just love seeing other people doing these different perspective views. It's so bloody tedious to get right, but it looks so great when you do. WWII44: Start making them. It's not really hard to do top-views, only tedious. |
Author: | David Latuch [ July 12th, 2014, 8:52 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB- | |
I just love seeing other people doing these different perspective views. It's so bloody tedious to get right, but it looks so great when you do.
Exactly, just a bit of knowledge about orthographic projections helps a lot. What is in one view dictates how it will look in the others.
WWII44: Start making them. It's not really hard to do top-views, only tedious. |
Author: | erik_t [ July 12th, 2014, 9:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB- |
These are fantastic. |
Author: | MihoshiK [ July 12th, 2014, 10:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB- |
I only just caught this, and this is an amazingly beautiful ship. It's hard to call most battleships graceful, but this manages quite easily. |
Author: | TimothyC [ July 12th, 2014, 11:31 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB- | |
well seeing as the Germans widened the Kiel Canal to facilitate the movement of dreadnoughts I don't see what is stopping the US from widening the Panama Canal for the same reason.
It is exceptionally unlikely that anyone in the US is going to fund wider locks in the Panama canal in the 1920s. While the projected new locks in the 1940s would have allowed larger battleships, the new ships were not the only trigger for such an expansion.
|
Author: | David Latuch [ July 12th, 2014, 11:43 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB- | ||
well seeing as the Germans widened the Kiel Canal to facilitate the movement of dreadnoughts I don't see what is stopping the US from widening the Panama Canal for the same reason.
It is exceptionally unlikely that anyone in the US is going to fund wider locks in the Panama canal in the 1920s. While the projected new locks in the 1940s would have allowed larger battleships, the new ships were not the only trigger for such an expansion. |
Author: | David Latuch [ July 13th, 2014, 12:47 am ] | |
Post subject: | Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB- | |
I only just caught this, and this is an amazingly beautiful ship. It's hard to call most battleships graceful, but this manages quite easily.
Thank you,This is quite the praise especially coming from you. Thanks again. I think she's a very pretty lady too. |
Page 4 of 16 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |