Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 16  [ 160 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 616 »
Author Message
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB-Posted: July 11th, 2014, 8:06 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact: Website
Colombamike wrote:
Sad, worrying, upseting & disastrous
Sad to see some time lost in drawn personnal drawing (useless, with TOO many design errors/mistakes) when so many "real" or "never-were" designs are not drawn on Shipbucket

You have the (drawing) ability
But You can Not be Serious :(
People are allowed to draw whatever they want. Those who do not draw anything have no say in the matter whatsoever. Please do not make these kinds of comments...

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WWII44
Post subject: Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB-Posted: July 12th, 2014, 5:09 am
Offline
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm
any chance you could give a tutorial on drawing top-down views David?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
David Latuch
Post subject: Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB-Posted: July 12th, 2014, 8:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1341
Joined: January 16th, 2014, 1:02 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
So here now are both the Bow and Stern views of the USS New Hampshire (BB-55):

[ img ]

_________________
My Avatar is
French Vice-admiral Louis-René-Madeleine Le Vassor de La Touche, comte de Tréville
The original spelling of my last name is: LaTouche.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KHT
Post subject: Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB-Posted: July 12th, 2014, 8:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
I just love seeing other people doing these different perspective views. It's so bloody tedious to get right, but it looks so great when you do. :D

WWII44: Start making them. ;) It's not really hard to do top-views, only tedious.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
David Latuch
Post subject: Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB-Posted: July 12th, 2014, 8:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1341
Joined: January 16th, 2014, 1:02 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
KHT wrote:
I just love seeing other people doing these different perspective views. It's so bloody tedious to get right, but it looks so great when you do. :D

WWII44: Start making them. ;) It's not really hard to do top-views, only tedious.
Exactly, just a bit of knowledge about orthographic projections helps a lot. What is in one view dictates how it will look in the others.

_________________
My Avatar is
French Vice-admiral Louis-René-Madeleine Le Vassor de La Touche, comte de Tréville
The original spelling of my last name is: LaTouche.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB-Posted: July 12th, 2014, 9:39 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
These are fantastic.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB-Posted: July 12th, 2014, 10:40 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
I only just caught this, and this is an amazingly beautiful ship. It's hard to call most battleships graceful, but this manages quite easily.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB-Posted: July 12th, 2014, 11:31 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
WWII44 wrote:
well seeing as the Germans widened the Kiel Canal to facilitate the movement of dreadnoughts I don't see what is stopping the US from widening the Panama Canal for the same reason.
It is exceptionally unlikely that anyone in the US is going to fund wider locks in the Panama canal in the 1920s. While the projected new locks in the 1940s would have allowed larger battleships, the new ships were not the only trigger for such an expansion.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
David Latuch
Post subject: Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB-Posted: July 12th, 2014, 11:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1341
Joined: January 16th, 2014, 1:02 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
TimothyC wrote:
WWII44 wrote:
well seeing as the Germans widened the Kiel Canal to facilitate the movement of dreadnoughts I don't see what is stopping the US from widening the Panama Canal for the same reason.
It is exceptionally unlikely that anyone in the US is going to fund wider locks in the Panama canal in the 1920s. While the projected new locks in the 1940s would have allowed larger battleships, the new ships were not the only trigger for such an expansion.
I agree but this ship’s mission in part was to counter the Japanese no. 13 ship and her sisters. Sailing around the cape once was just a bit inconvenient that’s all. ;)

_________________
My Avatar is
French Vice-admiral Louis-René-Madeleine Le Vassor de La Touche, comte de Tréville
The original spelling of my last name is: LaTouche.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
David Latuch
Post subject: Re: What if there were no Wash.Treart: USS New Hampshire BB-Posted: July 13th, 2014, 12:47 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1341
Joined: January 16th, 2014, 1:02 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
MihoshiK wrote:
I only just caught this, and this is an amazingly beautiful ship. It's hard to call most battleships graceful, but this manages quite easily.
Thank you,

This is quite the praise especially coming from you.

Thanks again. I think she's a very pretty lady too. ;)

_________________
My Avatar is
French Vice-admiral Louis-René-Madeleine Le Vassor de La Touche, comte de Tréville
The original spelling of my last name is: LaTouche.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 16  [ 160 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 616 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 21 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]