Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 14 of 18  [ 173 posts ]  Go to page « 112 13 14 15 1618 »
Author Message
smurf
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 20th, 2015, 6:37 pm
Offline
Posts: 207
Joined: October 25th, 2014, 7:46 pm
Not me, unless my memory has failed completely, but I think it came up in the discussion of the L 1920 battleships designs, with all turrets on the same level.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Garlicdesign
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 20th, 2015, 6:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1071
Joined: December 26th, 2012, 9:36 am
Location: Germany
Hello again!

First - thanks for the praise.

About the turret height: I did not really think about that fire control problem, and luckily, I seem to be not alone there. Several battleships of the WWII era had all of their turrets on different levels (Yamato, Vittorio Veneto). I'm sure fire control is made easier if as many turrets share the same height, but on a relatively small hull, I would not raise the level of the foremost turret for topweight reasons. Maybe Turret B could be placed two pixels lower; let's see what I can do there.

Greetings
GD


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
DG_Alpha
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 20th, 2015, 9:51 pm
Offline
Posts: 762
Joined: January 1st, 2012, 7:01 pm
Location: Germany
She looks absolutely lovely, the camo is especially great.

_________________
My worklist
Any help and source material is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
waritem
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 20th, 2015, 10:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 354
Joined: August 4th, 2011, 6:37 am
Location: France
I take this occasion to upload the first ship for my main AU nation: The Cretan Republic.

To be short (a complete history will be posted……. one day) the republic was created after French expedition under the Duc de Beaufort succeeded to lift the siege of Candia. Having developed its own mixed origins culture it remain a separate nation when Greece gained its independence.

Despite being a small country it have a strong navy: by the time of the Second World War, although ground and air forces had become independent, half of the Cretan military personal was serving in the navy.

The Cretan warship design have moved from strong French influence in the XVIII° century to a mixed style mainly influenced by Italy, Japan, and Soviet Union.

Neutral during WWI and considered as a minor navy, Crete wasn’t invited to sign the Washington Naval Treaty. But, as the Fascist Italy was considered the main threat to Cretan domination over eastern Mediterranean Sea, the limits of the coming London treaty were used as reference at least for the displacement of the ship.
The goal was to have something just ahead of the Italian battleships in order to save enough personal to operate three battleships.
The first Italian design, prepared in 1928, called for a 23.000 long tons ship armed with a main battery of six 381 mm (15.0 in) guns in twin turrets. Taking this as a starting point the Cretan admiralty asked for 25.000 long tons ship with an equivalent main battery but using triple turrets. The extra weight would be used to increase protection, and eventually speed. The main gun should also be designed for a greater range than the Italian one. This would enable to engage the enemy sooner and support more hits than there foe.
Although after 1930 the Italian Navy abandoned the design in favor of a heavier one, the Cretan project kept going on those bases. A bigger battleship would have meant reduce their number to two. This wouldn’t have allowed keep at least two units operational at any given time.

The last evolution of the project included the new devices designed for the ships being currently rebuilt (former Russian and Italian battleships), except the lifeboat fast launching system (see ships to come) who was design latter and the Bulbous bow who wasn't retained for this design.
The ship inherited of the Cretan characteristic compact conning-tower integrating the funnel.
This combined with only two triple main gun turrets could have drastically reduced the armored citadel, but the Cretan obsession for fire arc and quick target change (turrets were able to turn 360°) have thwarted this potential.
The main guns were finally derived from the 370 mm gun of the Spártakos (former Izmail), instead of brand new 381 mm. The original 356/52 mm Russian guns were being rebored at 370/50 mm. The final design was a 370/52 mm gun with a range of 43.730 m at a 35° elevation. Although range was marginally superior to the Italian opponent, they were supposed to have a smaller dispersion and a longer barrel life.
The secondary weapons were DP 130mm in 10 twin turrets.
Smaller weapons were planned but not yet chosen.
The ship would had 4 floatplanes using two retractable catapultes.

[ img ]

_________________
"You can rape history, if you give her a child"
Alexandre Dumas

JE SUIS CHARLIE


Last edited by waritem on November 16th, 2020, 4:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Biancini1995
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 20th, 2015, 11:05 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm
O_O Man...that's a strange one but I Love it!Very Unusual design!

_________________
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Sumeragi
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 20th, 2015, 11:24 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 136
Joined: December 22nd, 2014, 10:38 am
Nice design, I like it.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 20th, 2015, 11:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
there is a lot of wasted space on that ship though, because the boilers are under the funnels, but where are the turbines? I can see the space aft of the funnels being used just fine, but forward of the bridge is a big space of..... what exactly?
you also have some windows next to the gun barbettes (no armoured space there?) and I do wonder why there are 4-5-6 cranes on board? again, the forward ones seem to be of no real purpose?

interesting design though (weren't there some Kongou class replacement designs like this?)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
apdsmith
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 20th, 2015, 11:44 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Hi Ace,

Is that too far for the boiler uptakes to be trunked back?

Regards,
Ad

_________________
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
[ img ]
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 21st, 2015, 1:25 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Howdy Waritem,

That is certainly an unusual design, not in a bad way, just one I had not seen before.

I can only suggest that the cranes in front of the bridge are tied to your retractable catapults. Are you able to place an inset on the drawing to show how that works?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 21st, 2015, 9:10 am
Offline
Posts: 7232
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Excellent work Garlicdesign. A superb drawing and the splinter camo looks superb.

waritem has certainly come up with an interesting design. Certainly working to these kinds of limits requires some innovative thinking in layouts I think.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 14 of 18  [ 173 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 112 13 14 15 1618 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]