Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 3  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3
Author Message
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: Command CruiserPosted: June 22nd, 2011, 10:44 am
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
PSS bet you took this one then?
[ img ]

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Command CruiserPosted: June 22nd, 2011, 1:12 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
SpamBot 454 wrote:
I experimented with both vertical and horizontal loading arrangements, and found that the latter didn't give the desired results, though I may look at it again with the current mods in place.
The Mark 4 GMLS loaded from below. See Boston and Canberra.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: Command CruiserPosted: June 23rd, 2011, 10:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
MitcheLL300 wrote:
PSS bet you took this one then?
[ img ]
Yes, that one.

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: Command CruiserPosted: June 23rd, 2011, 10:38 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
As for guns, I've been seriously rethinking the whole thing, and have thought about a later era design with twin or even triple TAK-120s squeezed into roughly the same turret structure. Is this possible?

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Command CruiserPosted: June 24th, 2011, 8:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Quote:
Your name and ALVAMA's were on the original 1978 De Ruyter, so I included both of you. Bezo is there for the box launchers, and Colo for the turrets and underwater hull, and hopefully, that's everyone. I'd rather error on the side of caution when crediting.
Well yes, but with 'parts' like the box launcher,we don't atrribute the originator, otherwise you should do the same for every other part shown. Generally, if we kitbash another drawing we must recognise the originators name foremost, so here you are saying it was from an original hull by Colosseum - so yes, quite correct. From what I can see the only bit of the ship that originated from MitcheLL300 is the upper foremast modification he did on a drawing by Alvama, so I wouldn't expect him to insist on a credit - and he isn't.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: Command CruiserPosted: June 24th, 2011, 9:43 am
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
Well i am credited on my own drawing only because i modified it.
But...
Almost nothing is from me on there, exept the modification idea and work out.

The masts are from Alvama's PERU version of the cruiser.
And the rest is just a kitbash and changing some looks of the ship.
And i used part sheets with that...

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Command CruiserPosted: June 25th, 2011, 1:40 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
SpamBot 454 wrote:
Quote:
I think then the Swedish RB-08 would be the best option here, and Psilander has designed cannisters for AU use with regards to that
The cannisters might work, the modified target drone, on the otherhand, will not.
Why not?

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
CATZ
Post subject: Re: Command CruiserPosted: June 26th, 2011, 2:22 am
Offline
Posts: 206
Joined: November 13th, 2010, 9:54 pm
SpamBot 454 wrote:
As for guns, I've been seriously rethinking the whole thing, and have thought about a later era design with twin or even triple TAK-120s squeezed into roughly the same turret structure. Is this possible?
You should be able to get three in there. But two is a safer bet.

_________________
"All your base are belong to us"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: Command CruiserPosted: June 29th, 2011, 3:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
Quote:
From what I can see the only bit of the ship that originated from MitcheLL300 is the upper foremast modification he did on a drawing by Alvama, so I wouldn't expect him to insist on a credit - and he isn't.
Quote:
Your name and ALVAMA's were on the original 1978 De Ruyter, so I included both of you. Bezo is there for the box launchers, and Colo for the turrets and underwater hull, and hopefully, that's everyone. I'd rather error on the side of caution when crediting.
Well yes, but with 'parts' like the box launcher,we don't atrribute the originator, otherwise you should do the same for every other part shown. Generally, if we kitbash another drawing we must recognise the originators name foremost, so here you are saying it was from an original hull by Colosseum - so yes, quite correct. From what I can see the only bit of the ship that originated from MitcheLL300 is the upper foremast modification he did on a drawing by Alvama, so I wouldn't expect him to insist on a credit - and he isn't.
I didn't track down every version of the ship to figure who modified what. I just saw both names on it, figured it was a joint effort, and included both for the sake of being on the safe side. I'll remove Mitch's name on the final, when I finally finalize it.

Regarding the box launchers by Bezo, they aren't generic parts from the sheets, rather fairly unique, (and extremely well done) ones, so I felt it proper. I can remove that name as well if required.

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 3  [ 29 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]