Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 3  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3
Author Message
Ro-Po Max
Post subject: Re: IRL Mistress-Class Nuclear ULCVPosted: February 6th, 2018, 1:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 961
Joined: May 1st, 2017, 8:35 am
Location: ARCC
Contact: Website
[ img ]
[ img ]

_________________
More here:viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8292


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: IRL Mistress-Class Nuclear ULCVPosted: February 6th, 2018, 3:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
If the wind force alone is enough to fling containers around no spoiler or wind break in the world is going to help because you've just found a tornado.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ro-Po Max
Post subject: Re: IRL Mistress-Class Nuclear ULCVPosted: February 6th, 2018, 3:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 961
Joined: May 1st, 2017, 8:35 am
Location: ARCC
Contact: Website
Thiel wrote: *
If the wind force alone is enough to fling containers around no spoiler or wind break in the world is going to help because you've just found a tornado.
Beauty requires sacrifice :lol:

_________________
More here:viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8292


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: IRL Mistress-Class Nuclear ULCVPosted: February 6th, 2018, 4:29 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Imoto claims a 5% fuel savings due to reduction in air resistance, which quite surprised me.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ro-Po Max
Post subject: Re: IRL Mistress-Class Nuclear ULCVPosted: February 6th, 2018, 4:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 961
Joined: May 1st, 2017, 8:35 am
Location: ARCC
Contact: Website
erik_t wrote: *
Imoto claims a 5% fuel savings due to reduction in air resistance, which quite surprised me.
So I'm talking about streamlining, and not about the clamping force of air :?

_________________
More here:viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8292


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
matedow
Post subject: Re: IRL Mistress-Class Nuclear ULCVPosted: February 12th, 2018, 10:47 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 32
Joined: October 23rd, 2017, 11:38 am
Wikipedia & Universe wrote: *
matedow wrote: *
The sidelight has to be placed where it can be viewed from "right ahead." This would mean that you would place it where the bow starts to bend in toward the stem. This is why they are often mounted on the bridge wings. They usually have the visibility both forward and abaft the beam that is required by the rules.

It also has to be mounted where it can be accessed for bulb changes, but with the advent of LEDs, this is less important.
Looking at the drawing, where would you personally mount it?
Probably just abaft the name on the bow or on the bridge wing if you move the mast a little farther aft. With your centerline lights (masthead lights) on the roof of the bridge and at the top of the mast, that would give you good visibility and separation of the lights.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 3  [ 26 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]