Concerning the ""Teutonischen":
To me (and according to the cutaway drawing i've found) machinery are under that level. As the ship is suppose to operate only in the baltic sea (if not as coastal battleship) it needs less accomodation and storage.
when i said : "maybe i will rework it a bit", i had the bow in mind. I don't know if i choose an other design (a more german vertical one) or simply keep the original.
OK, the 1922 refit makes sense, for a given usefulness of the ship afterwards. As I said, can't help you much with the bow.
About the name the idea was to call it "teutonic" (there was a steamship called this way), but maybe that's not working in german. But the problem is even worst: i've checked the german version of wikipedia and it seems that the knight order is referred as "teutonic" only in foreign countries. in german it's generally called "german order"................
Right, calling it the "Deutscher Orden" might be a bit ambitious/bombastic. If it is a single-ship class, why not go for it, but if you have a continuity of ship names in mind, may I suggest calling it the "Deutschherren" class and naming each one for an outstanding historical member of the order?
OTOH, I noticed that the "the Teuton" naming attempt sounded a bit like the Polish Navy's use of regional peoples (see e.g. ORP Kaszub). I think this was a French tradition as well? ("Le Corse", "Le Breton", etc.)
Under that angle, you could imagine a class of ships named after local Germanic peoples: "The Teuton", "The Prussian", "The Frisian"...
Concerning the "Drang nach Osten" : offending the soviet union is not a problem as fighting it is almost the reason why the duchy exist, and they never had any diplomatic relation with this "Eastern neighbor".
That's more or less what I understood from your summary. Being already at war, you don't have much to lose in bilateral relationships, might as well make the message clear.
Thing is, that phrase is also IMHO
way too steeped in German nationalism and expansionism for a state (even a minor one) overtly sponsored by Great Britain in France in the 1920s. So on a wider scale, you might want to avoid excessive expressions of Germanic nationalism if you want your Duchy to keep their sponsors on its side. Guess it's a matter of balance between threat perception of the USSR and Germany.
By the way i'm still wondering the way i will "finish" the story off the duchy:
- Is it invaded by the soviet union at the same time they invaded baltic states in real life?
- The same time they invaded Finland (a close ally in my AU)?
- Or annexed by germany?
See above, IMO it depends on how anti-Soviet and anti-German everyone is in your 1930s Europe. If the timeline works out much like IRL,
mutatis mutandis, the Duchy is probably going to fall to the first wave of Anschluss, and welcome it with open arms. With the USSR recovering from the civil war and waking up to a resurgent Germany, they will very early see the threat of a warlike Germanic antagonist on their border, one that could implicitly get reinforcements from the Reich at the drop of a hat. At least expect more concrete tensions in the area than IRL, possibly with Soviet intelligence stirring up dissent in the Baltic/Slavic population of the Duchy (heh) and tension rising much more quickly once WW2 starts, at worst a Winter War on two fronts. A combination of both gives you that most exquisite of clusterucks, a Spanish-like civil war on the Eastern front...
The course of the war might not be inflected much, and the outcome of Yalta will ensure that the Duchy falls into the Soviet sphere. If it survives as a satellite state and does not get Sovietized properly, it would make for a very convenient flashpoint in a WW3 scenario
à la Operation Unthinkable.