Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
Condamine Class FFG Redux http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=4946 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | heuhen [ February 27th, 2014, 8:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Condamine Class FFG Redux |
Good work, but haven't studied it good, but it looks good. but I'm going to nitpick on that sonar, there are better one laying around. |
Author: | eswube [ February 27th, 2014, 8:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Condamine Class FFG Redux |
Great work. |
Author: | Rodondo [ February 27th, 2014, 8:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Condamine Class FFG Redux |
Oh LEUT, why aren't you in charge of Navy Procurement! Great stuff |
Author: | LEUT_East [ February 27th, 2014, 9:15 am ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Condamine Class FFG Redux | |
Good work, but haven't studied it good, but it looks good.
Any suggested sonar formats would be well appreciated mate
but I'm going to nitpick on that sonar, there are better one laying around. |
Author: | heuhen [ February 27th, 2014, 9:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Condamine Class FFG Redux |
Look in the archive, on US destroyers at least thee tree last classes shall have something. |
Author: | Bombhead [ February 27th, 2014, 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Condamine Class FFG Redux |
Excellent stuff Leut. Great drawings. |
Author: | LEUT_East [ February 28th, 2014, 12:27 am ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Condamine Class FFG Redux | |
This isn't the place to discuss it but I really don't like that non-restrained grey... I feel it should be drawn similarly to the old model (which fits SB standards).
Can you please explain what you mean by this...I have no idea what you are trying to say? Are you saying that the ship (and subsequently the whole IFAN AU) colour scheme should be changed to another shade of grey?I am open to any ideas... |
Author: | erik_t [ February 28th, 2014, 6:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Condamine Class FFG Redux |
I can't help but wonder if there's a better arrangement for the Phalanx and SLQ-32. The former's search radar will be continuously irradiating the latter. I don't know how well the latter will reject the former's signal (and anyone who does know shouldn't share any details!), but it sure can't be good. Some separation might avoid the problem entirely. Phalanx fore and aft, perhaps? |
Author: | Gollevainen [ February 28th, 2014, 8:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Condamine Class FFG Redux |
I splitted the radar confontration to a new thread in the partsheets. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |