Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
Statocracy of Slovada http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=4121 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Fox [ March 28th, 2013, 4:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Statocracy of Slovada |
So I guessed it's time I no longer try to spam the beginners thread, but I still need a lot of opinions and guidance. first off the country I have been creating the ships for. general info:
the areas I need your expertise on. -Militairy might I took 2% of my Population (71 Million) which resulted into a active military personnel of 1.420,000 does this sound correct to you? also I took the total GDP ($2.667 trillion) took 2% of it and got $5.343 Billion same question here now if these numbers are correct, I would need a proper military. what do you suggest looking at my location? I'm personally thinking about a mainly blue water fleet, with possibly, a smaller brown water fleet as support, most likely a few small attack craft with a few corvettes I like to have the most funding into the navy, same holds for personnel. now I have no clue how to start, so guide me away. thank you in advance Link to my SMSwiki (not even close to 1% finished) http://statesmanship.co.uk/wiki/Slovada |
Author: | Fox [ March 28th, 2013, 4:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Statocracy of Slovada |
Ships Already done Type, Class, OPV, Prowler Class |
Author: | Fox [ March 28th, 2013, 4:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Statocracy of Slovada |
Ships WIP or needing refinement, guidance needed Type, Class SSK, Tulga Class CGN, Bau Class CGN, Stratosville (Heavy WIP) |
Author: | Shipright [ March 28th, 2013, 5:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Statocracy of Slovada |
Are you saying 5 billion is your annual budget? Thats not enough to design/build/field even one of those cruiser hulls. Also do some calculations on the scale of the forces you are proposing. Assuming you devoted your entire military budget to pay you would be able to pay every one of your 1,420,000 service members $3763.00 a year. Unless you are impressing these people out of seedy port side drinking holes I don't see you getting many volunteets. Take a look at some real nations and do some relative comparisons. for instance: - The US with a population of over 300M people has nearly the same number of people under arms as you at 1,458,000 active service members. That constitutes about .4% of the population. - The UK has a smaller population than your country at 63 million in 2011 but has a military budget of $67B at 2.6% of GDP in the same year. So I suggest you take a look at your starting numbers again because as it stands you have an extremely poor nation impressing a large portion of its military age population at basically below subsistance levels! |
Author: | Fox [ March 28th, 2013, 6:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Statocracy of Slovada |
Then my calculations must be way of, I will take a look at it again. So I took a close look at the UK, and the following numbers should be more realistic: Budget $78 Billion (More budget, because the country is a statocracy) Active Personnel 264,740 |
Author: | Shipright [ March 28th, 2013, 6:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Statocracy of Slovada |
I think you might have had a decimal error in your military budget comparisons. I thought it was fishy that with such a large GDP 2% yielded such a low military budget. When I do the math I get $53B, not 5.3B! Or maybe I counted too few zeros? XPOST: Looks like you caught it, and the new numbers are much more workable, that puts your budget at 2.9% of GDP. So what sort of threats does your country face? Allies and enemies? Proximity of each and naval vs land assets of each? To be honest from the map we have a blue water fleet doesn't look like the option you would go with. You need to keep the sea LOCs between the two landmasses your country has open but given the proximity to each other all your air assets can be shore based and as there is no ocean going requirements you can rely on small and cheaper littoral and near litoral craft. I am not sure of the scale but land based ASMs would also be very useful to you. If either of your major enemies are adjacent to you on those land masses your military might be tied up in land based defense unless you have allies as buffers. |
Author: | Fox [ March 28th, 2013, 6:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Statocracy of Slovada |
My apoligies I think the scale I posted my country on doesn't reflect the real situation. here is a link to show why a blue water fleet would be a good choice Slovada is marked in bright red, on the left side of the map http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/6993/slovadamap.png now, as of proximity to enemies, I currently do not have "enemies" however I do plan on participating into Role-plays and or a kind of NATO pact. |
Author: | Colosseum [ March 28th, 2013, 7:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Statocracy of Slovada |
Shipright has some good feedback here. One of the downfalls of the AU/NS style nationbuilding is the tendency to focus entirely on the military instead of building the nation itself. |
Author: | eswube [ March 28th, 2013, 7:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Statocracy of Slovada |
One thing, regarding the background, I can tell You already, is that having 2% of population under arms is - at least in real world - a recipe for economic collapse (unless You're country like Israel that gets several billion dollars each year, courtesy of US taxpayer). Generally it's accepted that in peacetime the total strength of the armed forces shouldn't exceed about 1% of population (and 10% during war - but we're talking about major war, when national survival is at stake - like WW2). Otherwise it would create too great strain on the economy. In the 1980s Soviet Union had about 1,7% of population under arms, and we know how it ended. Greece has about 1,6%. And North Korea has some 4,5%. Sometimes You can get away with about 1,5% - like Singapore, South Korea or Taiwan - but You need to have really strong economy for that. And the map You've supplied and location of Your country don't suggest You would really need that 1,5% (considering that it's the land force that's most manpower-intensive service). |
Author: | Fox [ March 28th, 2013, 8:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Statocracy of Slovada |
Hmm, but still, if you look at the united kingdom which is by accident extremely close, population wise, GDP, and active pers serving. UK GDP $2.316 trillion Budget $62.7 billion Active Pers. 220,350 Slovada GDP $2.667 trillion Budget $78 Billion Active Personnel 264,740 Differences GDP $351 Billion in favor of Slovada Budget $15.3 Billion Slovada spending more on Military Active Personnel 44,390 More personnel for Slovada - Population Around 9 Million more for Slovada I presume I am not overspending at first glance |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |