I'll see what I can do.
There is a difference between a turbofan (airliners) and a turbojet (fighters).
Turboprops are very efficient at flight speeds below 450 mph (390 knots; 725 km/hr) because the jet velocity of the propeller (and exhaust) is relatively low. Due to the high price of turboprop engines, they are mostly used where high-performance short-takeoff and landing (STOL) capability and efficiency at modest flight speeds are required.
For what I am using the Turboprop is the way to go because having an aircraft that cruises at 200-300 KIAS at 5is going to be more efficient than having a turbofan/jet. Turbofans/jets are better optimized for higher altitudes and more speed.
The tail section of the attacker IS the engine, so power is not a problem.
I'm sticking with the attack craft I have now, because honestly,
I dont see the harm done. I still see it as an effective ground attack and bomber aircraft. Now with regards to the bomb bay. How is that superfluous? Just because the only carrierborne aircraft to use it was the buccaneer, that doesnt mean that the concept doesnt work. And besides, isn't drag one of the most important things in an aircraft design? Why would it not be smart to put bombs
inside the fuselage? Air Force does it.
_________________
Salide -
Denton -
The Interrealms
I am not very active on the forums anymore, but work is still being done on my AUs. Visit the
Salidan Altiverse Page on the SB Wiki for more information. All current work is being done on Google Docs.
If anyone wishes for their nations to interact with the countries of the Salidan Altiverse, please send me a PM, after which we can further discuss through email.