Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 58 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Go to page « 156 57 58 59 6090 »
Author Message
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 25th, 2012, 3:13 am
Offline
Posts: 3895
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Might you also include a couple Italian ships for this AU? You do such an amazing job with the German and British vessels, I'd love to see what you do with the Italian beauties!

-Matt

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
APDAF
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 28th, 2012, 2:21 pm
Offline
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am
Would you mind if I used the 20'' guns on the Superb?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 31st, 2012, 10:56 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
APDAF wrote:
Would you mind if I used the 20'' guns on the Superb?
If there is any hope you will draw something useful and finish it, yes.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Destroyer Tender Peter MutzenbacherPosted: January 31st, 2012, 11:04 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
WhyMe inspired me to do a tender for KM'46. This is the destroyer tender Peter Mutzenbacher, built at Rotterdam. Commissioned 1945.
[ img ]
I used WhyMe's excellent 'Gustav Nachtigal', enlengthened it, equipped her with 5"-DPs and radars, some more boats, a catapult and complete new stern, a slightly changed bow and many more details. Finally, 3/4 of her are redrawn.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 31st, 2012, 11:10 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
One issue I found early, the fore AA gun blocks most of the bridge's forwards view

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 31st, 2012, 11:17 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Rodondo wrote:
One issue I found early, the fore AA gun blocks most of the bridge's forwards view
That's true, it's a hasty installation, a few days before the invasion starts. But due to the width, vision is good enough.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Last edited by Ashley on January 31st, 2012, 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
SrGopher
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 31st, 2012, 12:07 pm
Offline
Posts: 371
Joined: April 13th, 2011, 9:21 pm
You have a destroyer tender participating in combat? Couldn't it just hang back around France or the Netherlands instead of moving in around Britain (unless this is after a harbor or something has been secured)? If it were just to do that, then there wouldn't really be a need to add additional AA guns.

_________________
Worklist:
Puerto Oeste - AU - WWI-WWII


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 31st, 2012, 1:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
SrGopher wrote:
You have a destroyer tender participating in combat?
Never said that. But tenders would be placed at harbors near to the frontline. So they would act in northern France, Belgium and Netherlands, mostly to support the ships with ammo.
These locations are prime targets for the RAF. Sinking one tender means stopping a complete destroyer flotilla.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
SrGopher
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 31st, 2012, 8:33 pm
Offline
Posts: 371
Joined: April 13th, 2011, 9:21 pm
Ah, I misunderstood that. When you said that the ship got extra guns for the invasion, I thought you meant that she was going in with the invasion. Well, its still a great drawing Ashley!

_________________
Worklist:
Puerto Oeste - AU - WWI-WWII


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 1st, 2012, 2:37 am
Offline
Posts: 3895
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Like the tender...keep up the good work! I can't wait to read the backstory for this AU!

-Matt

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 58 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 156 57 58 59 6090 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]