Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 58 of 65  [ 648 posts ]  Go to page « 156 57 58 59 6065 »
Author Message
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Parliamentary Republic of AtlantiaPosted: August 19th, 2013, 5:10 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
please, some data on this thing? displacement, length WL, beam WL and beam OA, depth and draft? I am not entirely certain this would be possible, but I just cannot grasp the scale of it right now without measurements.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Parliamentary Republic of AtlantiaPosted: August 19th, 2013, 5:24 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
L373.8m WL, W90.6m OA / 60m WL, D15.7m excluding sonar dome. More than anything I'm going for a trip into crazy land. I've not been there for a while :roll:

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Parliamentary Republic of AtlantiaPosted: August 19th, 2013, 7:06 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
hmm. quite huge, but the length seems not that much of an stretch. the increased depth (estimated 45 meters) and beam (20 meters more then other carriers) are of course required for the increased length and the 2 hangar decks (the depth for strength, the beam for stability). it is an stretch, but not entirely impossible....... somewhat impractical, she is for certain though.
might it be an coincidence or is your ship almost the same size as an Maersk Tripple E?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Parliamentary Republic of AtlantiaPosted: August 19th, 2013, 7:34 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
It might be a coincidence that it's bordering the T-E on sizes lines, I figure they're pretty much the largest vessels feasible before going into the realms of Seawise Giant and Habakkuk...

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Parliamentary Republic of AtlantiaPosted: August 19th, 2013, 8:02 pm
Offline
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
Wow, that's one crazy aircraft carrier! :D
What's the size of her air group? 200? :lol:


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Parliamentary Republic of AtlantiaPosted: August 20th, 2013, 11:01 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Not quite 200, more like 101. ;)

HMS Andarta Embarked Squadrons
  • 1x Fighter Squadron (F/A-14D+) - 12 Aircraft - (Easier than the whole navalising the F-15 approach)
  • 1x Strike Squadron (F/A-18F) - 12 Aircraft - (Replacing Ds)
  • 1x Strike Squadron (F/A-18D) - 12 Aircraft
  • 1x Strike Fighter Squadron (F/A-18E) - 12 Aircraft - (Replacing Cs)
  • 2x Strike Fighter Squadrons (F/A-18C) - 12 Aircraft each (24)
  • 1x EW Squadron (E/A-18G) - 4 Aircraft
  • 1x RECCE Detachment (RF-18D) - 3 Aircraft
  • 1x ASW Squadron (S-2) - 4 Aircraft
  • 1x Cargo / Tanker Squadron (KC-1) - 4 Aircraft
  • 1x AEW Squadron (E-1) - 6 Aircraft
  • 1x ASW(H) Squadron (AW101) - 4 Helicopters
  • 1x ASuW / CSAR Squadron (AW101) - 4 Helicopters
  • 1x Marine Transport Squadron (WS70) - 8 Helicopters
  • 1x Marine Attack Squadron (Tiger) - 4 Helicopters
Totals:
81 Fixed Wing
20 Rotary Wing

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Parliamentary Republic of AtlantiaPosted: August 21st, 2013, 3:12 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Updated the first post once again with some revised fluff. More to come :geek:

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Judah14
Post subject: Re: Parliamentary Republic of AtlantiaPosted: August 22nd, 2013, 3:56 am
Offline
Posts: 752
Joined: March 5th, 2013, 11:18 am
Hmm, why integrate BMD capability on an aircraft carrier? I can see the Aster Block 2 ABM and a radar system similar to the Raytheon Dual Band Radar on the Gerald R. Ford aircraft carriers. There is also the SCALP Naval cruise missile. Does this ship preform the same missions as Soviet/Russian "aircraft carrying cruisers"?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Parliamentary Republic of AtlantiaPosted: August 22nd, 2013, 11:34 am
Offline
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
That seems a relatively modest air wing for such giant. :lol:
But that's probably most that could be effectively operated.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Parliamentary Republic of AtlantiaPosted: August 22nd, 2013, 11:55 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Judah14 wrote:
Hmm, why integrate BMD capability on an aircraft carrier? I can see the Aster Block 2 ABM and a radar system similar to the Raytheon Dual Band Radar on the Gerald R. Ford aircraft carriers. There is also the SCALP Naval cruise missile. Does this ship preform the same missions as Soviet/Russian "aircraft carrying cruisers"?
Indeed, Atlantian naval aviation has never really truly accepted the aircraft carrier as simply that, there have always been attempts to dual or multi-role them. Considering the size of it and the prevalence of things like the DF-21 make it prudent for her to be able to look after herself lest her escorts either be lacking or for some reason non existent. SCALP-N is there mainly to be volleyed against targets prior to a first strike by aircraft lessening the danger to the air wing in the opening stages of a conflict.
eswube wrote:
That seems a relatively modest air wing for such giant. :lol:
But that's probably most that could be effectively operated.
I recall reading somewhere that the maximum real effectively deployable air wing caps out at around 100 much more and you start to waste your assets.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 58 of 65  [ 648 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 156 57 58 59 6065 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]