Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 51 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Go to page « 149 50 51 52 5390 »
Author Message
SrGopher
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: December 22nd, 2011, 11:53 am
Offline
Posts: 371
Joined: April 13th, 2011, 9:21 pm
I'm not very big on missile carrying vessels, but these are very fine cruisers!

_________________
Worklist:
Puerto Oeste - AU - WWI-WWII


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: December 22nd, 2011, 10:52 pm
Offline
Posts: 3910
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
I especially like the E-variant. Looking forward to more, especially the evolution of the Panzerschiffen!

-Matt

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Kleiner Flugzeugträger (CVE)Posted: January 11th, 2012, 3:31 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Directly imported from germany-navy.de comes the 'Kleiner Flugzeugtraeger' (small aircraft carrier), CVL. But with 6000 tons it's more a CVE, even by its mission.
Here the story from german-navy.de:
While the aircraft carrier Graf Zeppelin was still under construction, the German Naval Construction department started with design studies for other, smaller carrier. Besides as 12000t carrier (of which only very few information is left), a even smaller design - a 6000t ship - was made.

Called "Kleiner Flugzeugträger" - small aircraft carrier, this ship was only able to carry up do 15 aircraft of the size of a fighter aircraft. Without any armor protection and probably a diesel engine system, the ships would not be able to keep up the speed of other Kriegsmarine surface units, so their military used for the Kriegsmarine was very doubtful. They could be compared with the allied CVEs which were used to protect allied convoys in the North Atlantic in the later years of the war, but since the
Kriegsmarine did not depend on such convoys as the allied did, the idea behind this design is questionable.

Only a first design study was made, there were no plans to actually build ships like these.

In KM'46 the ships are useful, due to their speed of 32 kn. With an air wing of 15 Me-109T they gave superior protection for the big ships against air attacks.
The [ img ]

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 11th, 2012, 5:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Interesting design, but the use of only two proppellers is doubtfull. Many of the major units of the Kriegsmarine had 3 shafts. Also I think the after section of the ship is wrong (the water-plane as it is will cause too much drag, and that will result in a considerable speed loss IMHO).

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Biancini1995
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 11th, 2012, 8:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm
i loved the camo

_________________
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 12th, 2012, 12:48 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
So...they wouldn't have been able to keep up with surface units...but were built because of their 32 knot speed?

And studies have shown that a centerline prop is all but useless anyway due to keel turbulence.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 12th, 2012, 1:01 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
klagldsf wrote:
So...they wouldn't have been able to keep up with surface units...but were built because of their 32 knot speed
Does seem odd.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 12th, 2012, 1:11 am
Offline
Posts: 3910
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Nice work!

-Matt

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Comments CVLPosted: January 12th, 2012, 7:24 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Thanks for your comments. I agree, there is much improvement possible. The drawing is based on a loose drawing that led to the drawing on german-navy.de. I just added some minor details to make the design at least working. Now I'll redo it how I think it could have really looked like.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: January 12th, 2012, 8:14 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Now with three shafts, a more usefull flightdeck and rearranged aa. The speed does not seem a problem to me. Length is 160m, weight around 6000 to only, so no armor at all, maybe some on the standard 10,5cm aa turrets.
[ img ]

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 51 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 149 50 51 52 5390 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]