Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 32 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Go to page « 130 31 32 33 3446 »
Author Message
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 4th, 2011, 7:05 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
Ok,thanks you very much! I already have something similar, the Phoebus Class (Sigma 9213/9413),it is classified as an OPV.Please look at my main thread Hellenian Kingdom.Does Northerm Kingdom has any indigenous SSMs?I want to peplace SSM Penguin.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 4th, 2011, 8:51 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
odysseus1980 wrote:
Ok,thanks you very much! I already have something similar, the Phoebus Class (Sigma 9213/9413),it is classified as an OPV.Please look at my main thread Hellenian Kingdom.Does Northerm Kingdom has any indigenous SSMs?I want to peplace SSM Penguin.
Normally I use the American system, but I also use Norwegian systems where possible. Cannons is completely AU.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 4th, 2011, 11:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
updated:


[ img ]
[ img ]

Polar class Type B
Batch 1 is built up as LHC, while Batch 2 is built up as LPD
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 4th, 2011, 11:40 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I'd swap the aft gun and the missiles on the Polar B Batch 1.
You get a better field of fire and you don't risk shooting up your own missiles.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 4th, 2011, 5:34 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
Very impressive artwork Heuhen ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 4th, 2011, 5:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Bombhead wrote:
Very impressive artwork Heuhen ;)
thanks! I'm starting to become more and more patient, and that means I only get closer to and closer for example. ALVAMA or...!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 4th, 2011, 6:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Thanks for tips Thiel and Ace.. 8-)

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 4th, 2011, 6:59 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Impressive indeed. I do however wish the forum supported more replies per page than it does so I didn't have to browse through 32 pages :\

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 4th, 2011, 8:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
My honest assessment is: you're much better at modern vessels than you are at WWII-era and earlier, especially at this stage.

BTW, are these supposed to be nuclear powered? That honestly wouldn't make much sense for such a small ship.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 4th, 2011, 8:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
klagldsf wrote:
My honest assessment is: you're much better at modern vessels than you are at WWII-era and earlier, especially at this stage.

BTW, are these supposed to be nuclear powered? That honestly wouldn't make much sense for such a small ship.
According to TimothyC the life-cycle cost breaks even around 5000 tons. I don't know when that study was made though.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 32 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 130 31 32 33 3446 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]