Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
Nihon Kaigun 1946 http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1027 |
Page 30 of 52 |
Author: | BB1987 [ May 1st, 2013, 9:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946 |
if Emperor does not mind, i've tried to fix the "bugs" |
Author: | Navybrat85 [ May 1st, 2013, 9:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946 |
Ring kissing, BB1987? Aside from a friendly jab, looks better than the 12 x 14" original work I've been playing with for a week or so now....I like the Alaskas, and I like this take on it. |
Author: | Colosseum [ May 1st, 2013, 10:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946 |
You've left the aviation gas line on the hull, which doesn't make much sense as there's no aviation contingent on this ship (which also doesn't make sense). You should give it a stern catapult like the other BBs and cruisers. There's no reason for this not to have a mainmast with an SP fighter direction radar. Place a large lattice mast just ahead of the aft Mk.38 director. By 1945, I would expect that the catwalk around the armored conning tower would be enclosed. It might not have actual glass windows but it will still have an overhead canopy. |
Author: | BB1987 [ May 1st, 2013, 11:07 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946 | ||
Ring kissing, BB1987?
uh? Aside from a friendly jab, looks better than the 12 x 14" original work I've been playing with for a week or so now....I like the Alaskas, and I like this take on it. don't get me wrong, i'm not offended at all, but i simply did not get the joke
You've left the aviation gas line on the hull, which doesn't make much sense as there's no aviation contingent on this ship (which also doesn't make sense). You should give it a stern catapult like the other BBs and cruisers.
i've updated the drawing in the form of a rough WIP with some points amended and others not yet, so ican fix them again if they still don't work; moreover may i ask you if you have a clean version of the aircraft catapult? i've extracted it from your 1945 Guam, but because there was some superstructure behind it i don't know wich parts are to be deleted and wich not.
There's no reason for this not to have a mainmast with an SP fighter direction radar. Place a large lattice mast just ahead of the aft Mk.38 director. By 1945, I would expect that the catwalk around the armored conning tower would be enclosed. It might not have actual glass windows but it will still have an overhead canopy. |
Author: | Colosseum [ May 1st, 2013, 11:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946 |
Yeah - it reminds me that I need to post the sheet of the Alaska specific parts so all the kitbashers can use it. |
Author: | emperor_andreas [ May 2nd, 2013, 2:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946 |
I don't mind at all...looks good so far! |
Author: | Colosseum [ May 2nd, 2013, 3:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946 |
The superstructure is just too tall. I feel like this ship would capsize in the first heavy seas... |
Author: | emperor_andreas [ May 2nd, 2013, 4:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946 |
The hull would be wider to accommodate the 14-inch gun turrets, so that might cancel out some of the problem. |
Author: | Erusia Force [ May 2nd, 2013, 5:56 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946 | |
The superstructure is just too tall. I feel like this ship would capsize in the first heavy seas...
I was getting that feeling too.
|
Author: | emperor_andreas [ May 2nd, 2013, 6:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946 |
And yet nobody says anything about the Fusos... |
Page 30 of 52 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |