Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
Federative Republic of Brazil http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2725 |
Page 3 of 6 |
Author: | SHIPDUDE [ February 29th, 2012, 5:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Federative Republic of Brazil |
Make the oil rigs into fortresses! |
Author: | klagldsf [ February 29th, 2012, 5:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Federative Republic of Brazil |
IIRC the Iranians mounted SAMs and ASMs on oil rigs during the tanker war. That's as close as you're gonna get to making them a "fortress" (or making anything a "fortress" anymore). Interestingly enough the Iranians used them offensively which they could more or less get away with due to the confines of the Hormuz. I could be mistaken though as it's been a very long time since I read up on it. |
Author: | Rodondo [ February 29th, 2012, 8:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Federative Republic of Brazil |
Sounds like something the Iranians would do |
Author: | Carthaginian [ February 29th, 2012, 8:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Federative Republic of Brazil |
Heck... sounds intelligent, actually; one of the few things I would credit the Iranian military for doing correctly. If I wanted to defend the approaches of Mobile, Pascagoula, Biloxi, or New Orleans... well, arming the offshore platforms would provide me with a good 'opening punch'- especially if the approaching enemy forces weren't expecting that kind of things. I'd go from having several high-value targets to defend to having several nigh-unsinkable defensive outposts... though they might have a problem with exploding violently when hit unless you had time to cap the well. |
Author: | Colosseum [ February 29th, 2012, 8:32 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Federative Republic of Brazil | |
Heck... sounds intelligent, actually; one of the few things I would credit the Iranian military for doing correctly.
How survivable would the average offshore platform be against missiles and gunfire?
If I wanted to defend the approaches of Mobile, Pascagoula, Biloxi, or New Orleans... well, arming the offshore platforms would provide me with a good 'opening punch'- especially if the approaching enemy forces weren't expecting that kind of things. I'd go from having several high-value targets to defend to having several nigh-unsinkable defensive outposts... though they might have a problem with exploding violently when hit unless you had time to cap the well. |
Author: | Blackbuck [ February 29th, 2012, 8:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Federative Republic of Brazil |
Not very especially when things catch fire. Piper Alpha only done with military means... |
Author: | Thiel [ February 29th, 2012, 9:05 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Federative Republic of Brazil | |
How survivable would the average offshore platform be against missiles and gunfire?
Not at all.
|
Author: | SHIPDUDE [ February 29th, 2012, 9:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Federative Republic of Brazil |
+guns+missiles=more defensive élan than nuclear battlecruisers. |
Author: | SHIPDUDE [ February 29th, 2012, 10:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Federative Republic of Brazil |
Anway, you're missing the SHIPDUDE point. It's as logical to turn your oil rigs into armored concrete battle islands as it is to build a giant slab-sided nuclear battlecruiser to protect them! Iranian oil rigs were only involved in military action because they were in the chokepoint of Hormuz. Look at the map of Brazil - there may be a difference but I'm terrible at geography! People aren't going to cross the ocean and invade oil rigs D-day style! If the oil crisis is so bad that people are taking over rigs, they'll look like this: Honestly trucks would be a better defense than an inherently offensive "BCGN." |
Author: | Hawkeye [ March 1st, 2012, 3:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Federative Republic of Brazil |
Smokers... Smokers everywhere!! |
Page 3 of 6 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |