Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 13 of 35  [ 349 posts ]  Go to page « 111 12 13 14 1535 »
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Re: kingdom of HaramPosted: November 24th, 2011, 9:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
THX! :-D


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: kingdom of HaramPosted: November 25th, 2011, 6:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
HHoMS Lord, when she was active again after a major refit:

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Re: kingdom of HaramPosted: November 26th, 2011, 2:35 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
The phrased arrays would more likely be angled back. The best aspect for a phased array is, of course, exactly perpendicular to the surface. Long Beach's (and Enterprise's) SPS-32/33 was explicitly a very long range search and track set, with intentionally low precision. As such, pointing it right at the horizon made sense - that's where your targets were (even 5deg above the horizon at 200nmi is... extremely high altitude). A system that is for higher precision search and fire control at shorter range (like SPY-1, APAR, Grave Stone, etc etc) will be angled back so that the maximum useful radar elevation is approaching straight up.

These phased arrays probably won't be very good for very long range search. A dedicated rotating array (probably 2D, like LW-08 or something) would be an appropriate addition. I don't know how necessary your current rotating array is. The range is likely to be low.

For all this equipment, the superstructure block is actually very small! I think it probably needs more volume inside for both people and electronics. Remember that it's mostly at a 45 degree angle, so it's not nearly as big a box as it looks from the side.

The navigation light (green thing on dark gray thing) doesn't make sense in its current location.

I don't see any ESM/ECM, or VHF/UHF comms. Just HF. HF is good for some stuff (long range comms with other ships), but you need VHF and/or UHF as well. And of course something this big needs ESM/ECM equipment.

It would also make a lot of sense to distribute some of the illuminators along the superstructure aft, as the field of view for each illuminator would be better.

Four screws is an awful lot. It means four sets of reduction gears. I don't think there's a single post-WW2 combatant of less than CVN size that has more than two screws.

It would make more sense, of course, to have a 76mm on each beam and a 5" (?) on the centerline forward.

Some TACAN is necessary!

The forward liferafts are in a dangerous position, and I'd expect them to be lost to a heavy sea.




But this is a fun design. I like it!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Re: kingdom of HaramPosted: November 26th, 2011, 5:12 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
erik_t wrote:
The phrased arrays would more likely be angled back. The best aspect for a phased array is, of course, exactly perpendicular to the surface. Long Beach's (and Enterprise's) SPS-32/33 was explicitly a very long range search and track set, with intentionally low precision. As such, pointing it right at the horizon made sense - that's where your targets were (even 5deg above the horizon at 200nmi is... extremely high altitude). A system that is for higher precision search and fire control at shorter range (like SPY-1, APAR, Grave Stone, etc etc) will be angled back so that the maximum useful radar elevation is approaching straight up.

These phased arrays probably won't be very good for very long range search. A dedicated rotating array (probably 2D, like LW-08 or something) would be an appropriate addition. I don't know how necessary your current rotating array is. The range is likely to be low.

For all this equipment, the superstructure block is actually very small! I think it probably needs more volume inside for both people and electronics. Remember that it's mostly at a 45 degree angle, so it's not nearly as big a box as it looks from the side.

The navigation light (green thing on dark gray thing) doesn't make sense in its current location.

I don't see any ESM/ECM, or VHF/UHF comms. Just HF. HF is good for some stuff (long range comms with other ships), but you need VHF and/or UHF as well. And of course something this big needs ESM/ECM equipment.

It would also make a lot of sense to distribute some of the illuminators along the superstructure aft, as the field of view for each illuminator would be better.

Four screws is an awful lot. It means four sets of reduction gears. I don't think there's a single post-WW2 combatant of less than CVN size that has more than two screws.

It would make more sense, of course, to have a 76mm on each beam and a 5" (?) on the centerline forward.

Some TACAN is necessary!

The forward liferafts are in a dangerous position, and I'd expect them to be lost to a heavy sea.




But this is a fun design. I like it!

"Today is a good day to learn!" (a rewritten Klingon (Star Trek) statement)

I'll take to make the changes you mention / suggest, upgrade radar, etc. shall just make me a list of what you say and then .... ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Re: kingdom of HaramPosted: November 26th, 2011, 5:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Almost done to fix the errors / problems I'd had that Erik_t wrote about: superstructure remind now a little more on Long Beach as it suits this type of ship's quite good.

Note this is this class of ship as build, what is lacking is the upgraded version of the first one and Refit version of the two that were placed in reserve fleet at the end of their service period.

So before I continue, it is something I am missing?
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Re: kingdom of HaramPosted: November 26th, 2011, 8:49 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
deleted


Last edited by heuhen on November 26th, 2011, 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Re: kingdom of HaramPosted: November 26th, 2011, 8:56 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
------------------------------
Name: Knight class
Operators: Royal Haram Navy
Succeeded by: Worf class
Planned: 3
Completed: 3
Active: 2
Lost: 0
Reserve: 1
------------------------------
in class:
CGN 201 HHoMS Knight
CGN 202 HHoMS Lord
CGN 203 HHoMS Butler
------------------------------
General characteristics

Type: Guided missile heavy cruiser
Displacement: Fully loaded:
As build: 18,021t
Refit HHoMS Knight: 19,803t
Refit HHoMS Lord: 19,506t

Length:
• 680 ft (206m)
Beam:
• 79 ft (24 m)
Draft:
• 37 ft (11.2 m)

Propulsion: 3 nuclear reactors, 3 screws
Total output: 115,000 hp.
Speed: In excess of 34 knots
Range: unlimited max 20 years)

Boats and landing
craft carried: 2 boats

Complement:
As build: 1,005 officers and enlisted
Refit HHoMS Knight: 750 officers and enlisted
Refit HHoMS Lord: 1,100 officers and enlisted

Armament:
As build:
3 * Mk 13 with RIM-24 Tartar, RIM-66 Standard 1MR and Harpoon
2 * 76mm
1 * 127 mm
1 * Mk 29 with RIM-7 Sea Sparrow

Refit HHoMS Knight:
3 * Mk41 VLS with Rim 161 S3, Rim-156 S2 ER, RIM-66 S2, Harpoon, RGM-109 Tomahawk, RIM-162 ESSM and ASROC
2 * 76mm
1 * 127mm
2 * Phalanx 1B

Refit HHoMS Lord:
2 * Mk41 VLS with Rim 161 S3, Rim-156 S2 ER, RIM-66 S2, Harpoon, RGM-109 Tomahawk, RIM-162 ESSM and ASROC
2 * 76mm
1 * 127mm
2 * Phalanx 1B

as build:
[ img ]
Refit HHoMS Knight:
[ img ]
Refit HHoMS Lord:
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: kingdom of HaramPosted: December 1st, 2011, 12:02 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
------------------------------
Name: Eagle class
Operators: Royal Haram Navy
Succeeded by: Bird class
Planned: 105
Completed: 105
Active: 45
Lost: 12
Test ship: 3
Reserve: 45
------------------------------
General characteristics

Type: AAW or ASuW Fast frigate
Displacement: Fully loaded:
about 3,000+t


Length:
• 385 ft (116.6m)
Beam:
• 43 ft (13 m)
Draft:
• 12 ft (6.06 m)

Propulsion: Steam turbines 38,000 hp.
Speed: In excess of 34 knots. Because of wear and tear on the turbines was the top speed adjusted down to 27 + knots.
Range: 4,200 nmi at 16 knots. Refit 1: biger fuel tank: 5,800 nmi.

Boats and landing
craft carried: 2 boats

Complement: 130 (142 max) Refit 1: 115 (138 max)

Armament:
AAW:
1 * 76 mm DP gun
2 * 40mm/70 Twin compact Dardo
2 * Mk 48 mod 2 VLS with NSSM
2 * triple TT
6 * 12,7 mm gun
(some were equipped with AGM-119B Penguin Anti ship Missile)

ASuW:
1 * 127 mm gun
10 * AGM-119B Penguin Anti ship Missile Mk-2
2 * triple TT
(Some had 2 * quad launcher With RGM-48 Harpoon)
1 * Naval Apache with Penguine Mk3

Refit 1:
1 * Bofors 57 mm Mk3
2 * Phalanx 1A
2 * triple TT
2 * quad launcher With RGM-48 Harpoon later as test platform for NSM

AAW (Note the error in the text on the picture :lol: ):
[ img ]

ASuW with AGM-119B Penguin Anti ship Missile Mk-2/Mk-3 and Naval Apache with Penguine Mk3.
[ img ]

ASuW With RGM-48 Harpoon and Sea Apache with RGM-48 Harpoon.
[ img ]

Refit with Bofors 57 mm Mk3 and Phalanx 1A.
[ img ]




an old lady, you've seen it before so I say nothing, only that it was haram naval attempt to build a large monitor, the only advantage of this class had is that 5-8 of them could manage to defend themselves against a battleship . But Haram had only one and it was HHoMS Box.

Armar Equipment was:
1 * triple 16 "gun
6 * 6 " but because of weaknesses in the design, it was decided 5" standard guns instead. (But some of the Haram marine experts believed that they should rather go for the 4.25" DP guns instead
8 * 3 in HA (Mounted at later time.)
[ img ]


Last edited by heuhen on December 2nd, 2011, 5:59 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WhyMe
Post subject: Re: Re: kingdom of HaramPosted: December 1st, 2011, 12:23 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1616
Joined: November 12th, 2010, 4:27 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact: Website
[ img ]

_________________
Worklist: Portuguese Navy and Barnegat class seaplane tenders


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Re: kingdom of HaramPosted: December 1st, 2011, 12:26 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
WhyMe wrote:
[ img ]
thanks!

This time I drew the superstructure and the deck with all the equipment and weapons first and the hull last!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 13 of 35  [ 349 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 111 12 13 14 1535 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]