Shipbucket

Looks like you have the SPY-3 VSR as well, very nice. I'm wondering if you might be able to make a forward turret that blends with the superstructure better.

_________________
In Hoc Signo Vinces

By This Sign You Will Conquer

will try

spy-3 can it handle "Standard" missils?

Navy's main shipyards have expressed their interest in the Destroyer project.

DDX156-001 and DDX156-002
Multi role

Length: 156 meters
Width: 21 meters
Weight: 11,000 tons
Engine: Diesel Electric and jet turbines giving a total of 124,000 hp!
Speed: 31 knots

armament:
DDX156-001
2 * 127mm
1 * 76mm
ESSM (6 * MK-41 VLS)
NSSM 16 * (With the opportunity to reload)
4 * Sea PROTECTOR with 12.7 mm
1 Sea PROTECTOR with 12.7 mm and 2.75 "triple rocket lunches
8 * Torpedotubes

DDX156-002
3 * 76mm (Possibly the new 56 mm)
ESSM (6 * MK-41 VLS)
NSSM 16 * (With the opportunity to reload)
4 * Sea PROTECTOR with 12.7 mm
1 Sea PROTECTOR with 12.7 mm and 2.75 "triple rocket lunches
8 * Torpedotubes

Main radars:
Aegis Spy-3 MFR
VSR

Helicopter:
3 * NH90
or 4 * Westland Lynx

just to warn you: your ships get more unrealistic and ugly by the day IMO. I will not comment on this, as most of the comments I should make are already mentioned before, but you have not taken notice, or just ignored it. I think others think the same way, I think that's why you don't get comments on this AU. that said: you do very good work on real designs, and you are not lacking drawing skills, so take your own conclusions..... but as long as it stays this way, I will no longer comment in this thread.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Whoa Lets just relax a bit here. In fact, I was just admiring the DDX145-001 as being an interesting take on a trimaran hull, but finding that the DDX156-001 looked a bit cramped on the bow: I mean is that a sole main gun? And if so how does it even turn? What I mean is that we need to cut some slack with members projects when they are trying to produce their own ideas; and yes, that applies to me as much as anyone

not meant that way, the overall ideas are not bad... but things like those too small aegis ships and so on..... that is said a 1000 times already, still he says WE are wrong.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

I only say what I have been told by a particular person. A person who is a lieutenant commander in the Norwegian Navy, where he is one of many that are radar expert, he was part in projects for the new Frigate and decided how they should be, especially in the radar side. So I have an insight on this radar technology from a "different point of view" ...

Hope that answers why I am a bit like that when it comes to spy-1.

"And there are no limits on how high the spy-1 can be mounted, it's just that it is so **** hevy. And you do not want to capsize the ship! That's why they trying to build the radar as low as possible."