Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 5 of 34  [ 336 posts ]  Go to page « 13 4 5 6 734 »
Author Message
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Norseland: The Viking AUPosted: August 5th, 2012, 9:22 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2110
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
Oki doki.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Norseland: The Viking AUPosted: August 5th, 2012, 9:24 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
If you want a perfect example of some early jet flying boat concept check Saunders-Roe SR.A/1.

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Norseland: The Viking AUPosted: August 5th, 2012, 9:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2110
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
Alternative version with the nozzle at the tail tip of the plane: [ img ]

The shape of the plane is heavily influenced by the Saunders Roe.


Last edited by Karle94 on August 5th, 2012, 9:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Norseland: The Viking AUPosted: August 5th, 2012, 9:31 pm
Offline
Posts: 10678
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
Rhade meant, that You don't need sponsons, because they won't work for You, but You still need some sort of floats for stability on sea (like wingtip floats).


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Norseland: The Viking AUPosted: August 5th, 2012, 9:38 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2110
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
Wing tip floats added.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Norseland: The Viking AUPosted: August 6th, 2012, 6:41 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I still don't get why you'd want a jet powered scout plane. Like all early jets its range is going to be abysmal and since it's a two-seater flying boat it's not going to be farver than contemporary prop driven fighters.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Raven
Post subject: Re: Norseland: The Viking AUPosted: August 6th, 2012, 5:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 107
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 6:30 am
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Contact: Website, Yahoo Messenger
The barbettes on the Ragnarok, Odin, and Balder seem to be very high, and might create stability issues on the high seas. The turrets are also very tall, are they supposed to be autos?

_________________
In Hoc Signo Vinces

By This Sign You Will Conquer


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Norseland: The Viking AUPosted: August 6th, 2012, 6:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2110
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
They seem tall because the turrets are slightly shorter than most guns are compared to the height. The height of the barbettes are because the barrels must clear the top of the turret in front of it.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Norseland: The Viking AUPosted: August 15th, 2012, 6:54 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2110
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
Two new ships joins the fleet:

Kraken class heavy cruiser. The first heavy cruiser, or modern heavy cruiser as defined in the London naval treaty. The ship is from the late 20s-early 30s. The Kraken is armed with four twin 8 inch turrets and served as the blueprint of which the much larger Dreki and Gammur classes were would use. Developed as a modern and more cheaper and practical alternative to the armored cruiser. (See below)

[ img ]

A half finished armored cruiser. Unnamed as of now. Time period is early 20s-mid 20s. She`s armed with five twin 8 inch guns. This is not an armored cruiser in the same way as WWI armored cruisers but more a heavy cruiser before the international heavy cruiser designation existed.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KHT
Post subject: Re: Norseland: The Viking AUPosted: August 15th, 2012, 9:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
For the Kraken class: Those turrets look very big.

For the other one: Those aft turrets would feel good being more fore a bit. Also, what's up with the mixed secondary artillery?
I would suggest getting rid of the heightened mounts in superfiring/semi-superfiring position, and shorten the superstructure accordingly, to fit the 8" guns better. I don't think you can have that X mount that far aft and keep a hullform fit for cruiser speed.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 5 of 34  [ 336 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 13 4 5 6 734 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]