» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 5  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »
[Print view]
Author Message
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: DDG-51 - how it should have been builtPosted: February 17th, 2012, 11:31 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4706
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
it needs more torbedoes in manly calibers ;)

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Satirius
Post subject: Re: DDG-51 - how it should have been builtPosted: February 17th, 2012, 11:36 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 230
Joined: September 8th, 2010, 11:26 pm
Location: Lawrenceville, NJ
where's the bayonet if we're talking elan

_________________
ALVAMA wrote:
I feel sorry for you, I agree you must have such terrible life, and no girl give you attention, The boys leaved because they were not having a safe feeling when beeing with you. Police never found you. Docters did suidice, because they where impressed you was not killed by birth :)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Philbob
Post subject: Re: DDG-51 - how it should have been builtPosted: February 17th, 2012, 2:41 pm
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
they would run out of missiles pretty quick against a kamakazi

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: DDG-51 - how it should have been builtPosted: February 17th, 2012, 3:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I don't know, 96 Standards is enough to knock down the entire Fourth Carrier Division's combined air wing down. The 5" should be able to wreak plenty of havoc as well.
Load her up from bow to stern with ESSM and she'll be able to shoot down three quarters of the Kido Butai.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: DDG-51 - how it should have been builtPosted: February 17th, 2012, 3:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
What I miss are the broadside, casemated 5" guns! And where are the cage masts? 8-) :lol:

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Wolfman
Post subject: Re: DDG-51 - how it should have been builtPosted: February 17th, 2012, 3:42 pm
Offline
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm
Colosseum wrote:
[ img ]

Measure 32, design 22a, the medium pattern system.

In case anyone hasn't noticed, the modern military is completely bereft of elan. Hopefully this will restore some of it.
Do this to the regular Arleigh Burke design and I'll like it even more.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Biancini1995
Post subject: Re: DDG-51 - how it should have been builtPosted: February 17th, 2012, 3:49 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm
The CIWSs will destroy any aircraft in matter of seconds ;)

_________________
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Biancini1995
Post subject: Re: DDG-51 - how it should have been builtPosted: February 17th, 2012, 3:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm
This AU it's more looking like the Warship Gunner 2

Because in the game you can use WW 2 ships and modern ships against another ships like a H Class Yamato Ticonderoga...

And i'm thinking about to a AU based on the Game ;)

_________________
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: DDG-51 - how it should have been builtPosted: February 17th, 2012, 4:17 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Truly, the floatplane ought to be the A2D.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Wolfman
Post subject: Re: DDG-51 - how it should have been builtPosted: February 17th, 2012, 4:47 pm
Offline
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm
erik_t wrote:
Truly, the floatplane ought to be the A2D.
A Skyshark? IIRC, there was never any consideration of creating a floatplane version of either the Skyshark or the older Skyraider.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 5  [ 49 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]