Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 2  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2
Author Message
superboy
Post subject: Re: What next for the Independent Federation of Australia NaPosted: April 26th, 2014, 4:36 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 555
Joined: July 5th, 2013, 7:09 am
Location: Thailand
Contact: Website
If you install 12°ski-jump in the Mistral Class. i think your ship look more Interesting than Thai Navy aircraft carrier or the Canberra Class

the sample picture :D --> [ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: What next for the Independent Federation of Australia NaPosted: April 26th, 2014, 9:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
The deck on the Mistrals isn't stressed for STOVL ops, and changing that risks massive changes in internal design.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: What next for the Independent Federation of Australia NaPosted: April 26th, 2014, 9:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
the elevator most likely can't take it either. or, at the very least, is in an horrible place for STOVL operations.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: What next for the Independent Federation of Australia NaPosted: April 26th, 2014, 11:40 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
I'd like to see the IFAN during World War II. ;)

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: What next for the Independent Federation of Australia NaPosted: April 26th, 2014, 11:53 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
TimothyC wrote:
The deck on the Mistrals isn't stressed for STOVL ops, and changing that risks massive changes in internal design.
acelanceloet wrote:
the elevator most likely can't take it either. or, at the very least, is in an horrible place for STOVL operations.
I don't really see the problems.

This isn't the Real Designs forum.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: What next for the Independent Federation of Australia NaPosted: April 27th, 2014, 9:05 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
MihoshiK wrote:
TimothyC wrote:
The deck on the Mistrals isn't stressed for STOVL ops, and changing that risks massive changes in internal design.
acelanceloet wrote:
the elevator most likely can't take it either. or, at the very least, is in an horrible place for STOVL operations.
I don't really see the problems.

This isn't the Real Designs forum.
while that is true, an mistral with ski jump will no longer be a mistral. it is easier to draw an all new ship with that role then modify an mistral.......

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
shippy2013
Post subject: Re: What next for the Independent Federation of Australia NaPosted: April 27th, 2014, 9:14 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 658
Joined: March 26th, 2013, 7:44 pm
Location: Nottingham. United Kingdom
I think the deck of the Mistral is stressed for STOVL operations, when the design was in its infancy in the late 1990's concepts were shown of variations with ski jumps for STOVL operations. although not taken up by France or Russia, these concepts were although not taken up offered to Brazil, Canada and Australia with the view to operate harriers and indeed later F35's. Although to reduce cost some support may have been reduced I don't see putting it back as being to major of an issue...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: What next for the Independent Federation of Australia NaPosted: April 27th, 2014, 9:58 am
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
inshore and offshore patrol craft?
MCMV
Survey vessels

As has been said previous vessels

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
jabba
Post subject: Re: What next for the Independent Federation of Australia NaPosted: April 27th, 2014, 10:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...
Colosseum wrote:
I'd like to see the IFAN during World War II. ;)
I concur. It would be great to see some 'period' vessels with the Easty touch.

_________________
[ img ]
Jabba's Worklist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Oberon_706
Post subject: Re: What next for the Independent Federation of Australia NaPosted: May 8th, 2014, 1:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: April 1st, 2014, 12:17 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Hi LEUT_east and followers of this EPIC AU.

firstly I'd like to sincerely apologize for the hack-job that this post will seem to be, it's my first ever post, so be gentle...

The primary question was, what next? Well, whilst the most recent iteration of the Rockhampton Class FFGs is so good i want to see a real one, the thought had crossed my mind of what a repackaged Rockhampton would look like if generated out of the IFAN's participation in the Type 26 GCS program. To demonstrate, I've photoshopped RP1 & Gunship's T26 to produce the following;

[ img ]

Looks good doesn't it!

Another thought was to sanction the development of a second FFG series, again based on the T26 that, unlike the Rockhampton class, focused on the traditional frigate/destroyer escort role of ASW as it's primary function. In a significant bout of patriotism, names could be taken from famous battlefields and/or ANZAC Commanders from the western front in WW1. For Example;

IFAS FROMELLES, IFAS BULLECORT, IFAS POZIERS, IFAS PASSCHENDALE, PERRONE, POLYGON (as in 'polygon wood'), HAMEL, AMIENS, SIR JOHN MONASH, VILLERS-BRETTONEUX etc.

Weapons and sensor fit would include;

1 x Oto Melara 127mm Main Gun (with Volcano Ammunition)
2 x .30 cal auto cannons on typhoon mounts
4 x .50 cal mounts
24 x Mk 41 vertical launch cells (8 AAA cells for ASSM & SM-2 + 16 strike length cells for TLAM/ASROC/LRASSM/HARPOON block II)
2 x C_RAM CIWS systems
2 x Mk 32 triple launchers for Mk54 ASW torpedoes
Hanger and flight deck space for 2 x SH60-R Helo's with Thales FLASH-S dipping sonar and dual-mode sono-bouys + Griffin/HELLFIRE/BRIMSTONE + Mk 54 torpedoes
Thales 2087 Integrated sonar suite including the CAPTAS-4 Variable depth towed sonar array (slated to be fitted to T26 in any case)
CEAFAR + CEAMOUNT + usual suite of navigation and communications gear
Mine avoidance sonar


My Final suggestion was to do with the BAM-derived OPV concept. I've always seen the BAM vessels as a little bit 'weak' - they have a really low sustained cruising and top speed, they only really carry the 76/62 or similar as punch, and apart from that they don't do much else. Some alternatives could be;

[ img ]

This Avante-2400 variant proposed to Thailand from Navantia, OR;

[ img ]

This Fincantieri proposal for a development of the Italian Navy 'Commandante' class OPVs into a punchy little escort/patrol corvette. Would love to see what LEUT-east could do with either of these!

Hope this is a palatable/useful contribution to the discussion - any 'constructive' comments are welcomed. This padawan thanks you in advance for your forbearance.

Cheers.

_________________
"Come to the Dark Side... We have Cookies!"
____________________________________________

[ img ]
____________________________________________
Current Worklist;

DCFI (Falkland Islands) AU Nation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 2  [ 20 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 1 2

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]