Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
Self-protecting CVAN 1955 concept http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=8457 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | acelanceloet [ April 15th, 2018, 2:36 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Self-protecting CVAN 1955 concept | |
From Friedman's US Aircraft carriers:
This "self-protecting CVAN" was sketched in 1955 as part of a BuShips attempt to forecast warship possibilities. It suggests the promise of VTOL technology (presumably based on the Bell X-13, which was partly funded by the navy, and which could have landed in the "VTOL nets" abaft the island) and of the new surface-to-air missiles. The power plant would have duplicated that of the new Enterprise. Its dimensions were 990 feet (wl), 1030 feet (oa), by 132 feet wl by 36 feet, for a light ship displacement of 64875 tons (81150 tons fully loaded). Self-defense would have been achieved with the two Talos launchers (fore and aft of the island) and four Terriers (in quadrants). With three C 7 catapults, the CVAN would have operated conventional aircraft as well as VTOLs; her air group was listed as eight heavy bombers (A3D size), twenty-four VTOL interceptors, four night fighters (F3H-1N) and sixteen ASW helicopters (HRZS). Note that the carrier had no sonar and no ASW missile battery, although she would operate without escorting ships. Costs were estimated as $375 million for the lead ship and $340 million for the follow ships. In fact the must simpler Enterprise cost about 451 million, without defensive missiles.
Instead of the X-13, I have used the Ryan Model 115C VTOL interceptor that was designed based on the X-13 design. Components: RIM-8 Talos Mk 77 Talos FCS RIM-2 Terrier Mk 12 GMLS Mk 76 Terrier FCS Mk 10 GMLS Ryan Model 115C F3H Demon A3D Skywarrior AN/SPG-49 AN/SPQ-5 AN/SPW-2 .... |
Author: | Charybdis [ April 15th, 2018, 6:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Self-protecting CVAN 1955 concept |
Stunning work. Well done. |
Author: | Colombamike [ April 15th, 2018, 9:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Self-protecting CVAN 1955 concept |
Look same as a up-scaled "Charles de Gaulle" CVN (the French "Charles de Gaulle" CVN were slowly designed by 1974-1988) French naval-intelligence-service probably have these drawings data's during 1970's... |
Author: | eswube [ April 15th, 2018, 10:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Self-protecting CVAN 1955 concept |
Interesting design and great drawing. |
Author: | Hood [ April 16th, 2018, 7:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Self-protecting CVAN 1955 concept |
Always been intrigued by this concept and its great to see it in SB scale. It is an odd design, given it was only intended to operate a dozen non-VTOL aircraft it still featured no less than three steam catapults. The X-13 worked out surprisingly well with its neat platform landing system but doing the same on a rolling ship would have been trickier. One nitpick, the canopies of your various aircraft are a mix of new and old shades, they would look better if all the same shade I think. |
Author: | MihoshiK [ April 16th, 2018, 1:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Self-protecting CVAN 1955 concept |
Damn that ship must have lost a lot of space belowdecks to the missile magazines! |
Author: | heuhen [ April 16th, 2018, 5:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Self-protecting CVAN 1955 concept |
It's quite an interesting concept and a good drawing to. |
Author: | erik_t [ April 16th, 2018, 7:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Self-protecting CVAN 1955 concept |
Ooh, I've been wanting to see this concept illustrated for many years. A truly bizarre proposal (although "proposal" might be too strong a word). |
Author: | acelanceloet [ April 18th, 2018, 8:01 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: Self-protecting CVAN 1955 concept | ||
Look same as a up-scaled "Charles de Gaulle" CVN (the French "Charles de Gaulle" CVN were slowly designed by 1974-1988)
The French based their 2000+ carrier on an larger concept that was quite flawed (designed not by ship designers, but by people trying to predict the future of warship design) that is 40+ years older? No wonder the Charles de Gaulle was so flawed at launch! Any proof of this? French naval-intelligence-service probably have these drawings data's during 1970's... Or in other words, Colombamike, I don't agree with except if you give much more accurate details |
Author: | Colombamike [ April 18th, 2018, 8:25 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: Self-protecting CVAN 1955 concept | ||
Or in other words, Colombamike, I don't agree with except if you give much more accurate details
you are a player, will come the day you play both
|
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |