Its role was for heavy land attack, which as far as my knowledge goes the Soviets didn't really have any weaponry to fill that gap as most, if not all, of their cruise missiles were either anti-ship or anti-radiation, so this could have helped with targets outside of both enveloppes provided you had good enough targetting and fired enough of them at the enemy.
But the thing is, did land attack even figure in Soviet naval thinking? As I understand it the point of the Red Fleets surface units was to protect the submarines (Except for the missile boats whose job it was to facilitate a breakout from the Baltic and the Black Sea)
I realize they were moving towards a more expeditionary role (Hence the move to "real" carriers), a move the Russian Navy has continued, but by the time the Cold War ended they were still entirely focused on their anti "NATO" strategy and I can't see where land attack fits into that role.
_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.