| Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
| Spruance class never builds http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2173 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | acelanceloet [ November 13th, 2011, 10:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Spruance class never builds |
![[ img ]](http://i830.photobucket.com/albums/zz223/acelanceloet/DD-963SPRUANCE1980Mk71-1.png) ![[ img ]](http://i830.photobucket.com/albums/zz223/acelanceloet/DD-963SPRUANCE1984Mk71-1.png) ![[ img ]](http://i830.photobucket.com/albums/zz223/acelanceloet/DD-963SPRUANCE1995Mk71-1.png) ![[ img ]](http://i830.photobucket.com/albums/zz223/acelanceloet/DD-988ThornAGSbackfitopt1-1.png) ![[ img ]](http://i830.photobucket.com/albums/zz223/acelanceloet/DD-988ThornAGSbackfitopt2-1.png) ![[ img ]](http://i830.photobucket.com/albums/zz223/acelanceloet/DD-988ThornAGSbackfitopt3-1.png) these 3 are the 3 concepts for the USS Thorn AGS backfit. the no 2 concept was favored in the study, and that one was already in the bucket (with some mistakes though) only the air capable ones have to be done.... but I most likely won't do those (at least not all of them) so any takers? |
|
| Author: | MihoshiK [ November 13th, 2011, 11:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spruance class never builds |
You dun goofed up: Option 2 is represented twice. |
|
| Author: | TimothyC [ November 13th, 2011, 11:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spruance class never builds |
It's a text error. Option 2 and 3 are very close, but option three has the structural extension over the old 52 mount. |
|
| Author: | MihoshiK [ November 13th, 2011, 11:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spruance class never builds |
Eh? Damn, gotta stop posting this late... Edit: Sod it, I'm off to bed. Gotta go to work tomorrow. |
|
| Author: | heuhen [ November 13th, 2011, 11:41 pm ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: Spruance class never builds | |
Eh? Damn, gotta stop posting this late...
been there, done that ...
Edit: Sod it, I'm off to bed. Gotta go to work tomorrow. |
||
| Author: | acelanceloet [ November 14th, 2011, 7:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spruance class never builds |
all never builds fixed and uploaded above 
|
|
| Author: | ALVAMA [ November 14th, 2011, 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spruance class never builds |
Great! |
|
| Author: | Hood [ November 19th, 2011, 11:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spruance class never builds |
![[ img ]](http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c275/hangar/Shipbucket%20profiles/DDHDD-997Hayler.png) in 1978 Congress approved the construction of a single air-capable Spruance to allow operation of four helicopters, a later possibly a VTOL aircraft. The USN didn't really want this ship and successfully redirected the funds to a standard Spruance instead. |
|
| Author: | acelanceloet [ November 19th, 2011, 11:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spruance class never builds |
very nice! I only would like to see an 1995 config as well 
|
|
| Author: | Hood [ November 19th, 2011, 1:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spruance class never builds |
Like this? ![[ img ]](http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c275/hangar/Shipbucket%20profiles/DDHDD-997HaylerAU1995.png) Added the Grumman 698 on it too as a long-range ASW and AEW type with secondary anti-surface strike capability too. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|